Report of the 3rd Meeting
of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol
Distr.
GENERAL
UNEP/OzL.Pro.3/11
21 June 1991
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
THIRD MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES THAT
DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER
Nairobi, 19 - 21 June 1991
REPORT OF THE THIRD MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES
THAT DEPLETE T
INTRODUCTION
- United Nations Environment Programme, in Nairobi, from 19 to 21 June 1991.
- the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances
that Deplete the Ozone Layer
- 17 countries had acceded to the Protocol since June 1990. There were few
examples in the history of diplomacy where so many nations had agreed solidly
to address a common concern.
- Na.91-6017 /...
- and the Rapporteur
President: Mr. Ojwang K'Ombudo (Kenya)
VicePresidents: Mr. Peter Chin Fah Kui (Malaysia)
Mr. Ryszard Purski (Poland)
Mr. Eduardo Lopez (Venezuela)
Rapporteur: Mr. John A. Whitelaw (Australia)
- had not yet done so could become Parties to the Montreal Protocol. One of
the success stories in the struggle to protect the ozone layer concerned
Mexico, which was phasing out CFCs aerosols faster than some developed
nations. There was a need to replicate such successes.
- Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Byelorussian
SSR, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana,
Greece, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mexico, The
Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sri
Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukrainian SSR, United
Kingdom, USA, USSR, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Zambia and EEC.
The following 23 States not party to the Protocol were also represented:
Algeria, Angola, Bhutan, Burundi, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica,
Equatorial Guinea, Guinea, India, Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Morocco, Niger,
Philippines, Peru, Sao Tome & Principe, Sudan, United Republic of Tanzania,
Turkey, Yemen and Zimbabwe.
Observers from the following United Nations bodies and specialized agencies
were also present:
GATT Secretariat, I.C.A.O., IMO, UNCED, UNCHS (Habitat), UNDP, WMO, World
Bank.
The following other organizations were represented:
Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy, ARI (Air Conditioning and Refrigeration
Institute), CEFIC, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace International, Halogenated
Solvents Industry Association (HSIA), Harvard Global Environmental Policy
Project, ICC, Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), International
Council on Environmental Law, Japan Industrial Conference for Ozone Protection
(JICOP), Kenya Consumers Organization (KCO), Pharmaceutical Aerosol CFC
Coalition (PACC), Pro Scientia, Ulsan Chemical Company Ltd.
2729 June 1990):
- Adjustment and reduction;
- Amendment;
- Noncompliance;
- Reporting of data;
- Destruction technologies;
- The second assessment process;
- Data from developing countries;
- Control of trade with nonParties;
- Interim Multilateral Fund;
(b) Status of the Interim Multilateral Fund.
6. Consideration of the report of the Executive Committee on the progress
made with regard to the establishment and operation of the Interim
Multilateral Fund:
(a) Revised 1991 budget for the Fund Secretariat;
(b) The threeyear programme budget for the Fund;
(c) Criteria for project eligibility and guidelines for the implementation
of activities supported by the Fund;
(d) Criteria for considering bilateral and, in particular cases, regional
cooperation as a contribution to the Fund;
(e) Operational policies, guidelines and administrative arrangements;
(f) Rules of procedure for the Executive Committee;
(g) Tripartite agreement among the World Bank, UNDP and UNEP;
(h) Specific agreements between the Executive Committee and the
implementing agencies.
7. Proposed annex to the Montreal Protocol: List of products containing
the controlled substances.
8. Information reported by the Parties in accordance with Articles 7 and 9
of the Montreal Protocol: Secretariat's reports pursuant to Article 12 ©.
9. Revised budget for the Trust Fund for the Montreal Protocol for 1991
and the proposed budget for the biennium 19921993, including the cost of the
participation of developing countries.
10. Accession by Turkey to the Montreal Protocol.
11. Date and venue for the Fourth Meeting of the Parties.
12. Other matters.
13. Adoption of the report.
14. Closure of the Meeting.
C. Organization of work
21. The Meeting took up the agenda item by item.
III. CREDENTIALS
22. In accordance with rule 19 of the Rules of Procedure, the officers of
the Meeting examined the credentials of representatives and, having found them
to be in good and due form, so reported to the Meeting.
IV. SUBSTANTIVE MATTERS
23. The Preparatory Meeting had proposed that Rules 23 and 24 of the Rules
of Procedure of the Meetings of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol be
amended to read as follows:
Rule 23
If the President is temporarily absent from a session or any part thereof, he
shall designate a VicePresident to act as President.
Rule 24
If an officer resigns or is otherwise unable to complete his term of office
or to perform his functions, a representative of the same Party shall be named
by the Party concerned to replace him for the remainder of his mandate.
The proposed amendments were adopted without objection.
24. The delegate of China said that the gradual reduction in the volume of
ozone depleting substances was a vital element in the protection of the
environment. Only combined efforts of Contracting Parties and developing
countries at the Second Meeting of the Parties, in which China had played an
active part, had enabled the Amendment to the Protocol to be adopted, thus
tightening up control measures and providing financial support for activities
of developing countries in the cause of environmental protection. Against that
background the delegation had expressed at the Second Meeting the clear
intention of his country to accede to the Amended Protocol. In the meantime
the necessary technical structures had been set up and the legal formalities
for accession completed. The Instrument of Accession had been deposited with
the United Nations as Depositary on 14 June 1991. A year ago, with the help of
an Expert Working Group from UNDP, China had completed a study on the phaseout
of controlled substances and formulated a threeyear plan for the first phase
of implementation of the phaseout.
25. Many delegations welcomed the statement and congratulated China on its
accession to the Montreal Protocol and recalled China's valuable input into
discussion of the proposed financial measures of the Second Meeting. Several
also observed that early discussion of a country programme with China would be
necessary and the total sum of the Multilateral Fund increased accordingly.
One Delegation announced an immediate increase in its contribution to the
Multilateral Fund to US $2m and looked forward to the time when it would be
possible to tear up those parts of the Protocol which dealt with nonParties.
Many delegations expressed wishes to expand co-operation with China and
referred in this connection to their on-going and planned activities. There
was general agreement that China's accession to the Montreal Protocol was an
essential step in the process of implementing the Montreal Protocol.
26. The delegation of the Republic of Korea said that its Government,
concerned by the level of environmental contamination, had already imposed
strict measures to protect the ozone layer by legislative measures and
institutional restructuring, but felt bound to draw attention to the very
adverse effects which such measures were likely to have on young industrial
countries. In view of the extent of investment in CFC manufacture, any drastic
reduction in output could result in serious unemployment and social unrest.
Nevertheless legislation had been passed and would be implemented. It was
hoped that this cooperative attitude would be met by a voluntary transfer of
technology and appropriate financial resources. Success would only be possible
if developing and developed countries worked together.
27. The delegate of Malaysia said that, when his country became Party to
the Protocol in November 1989, parallel action had been taken to introduce
Customs Control regulations to monitor CFC and halon imports, but
unfortunately that had given rise to technical difficulties and countries with
developing economies required time to adjust to the provisions of the
protocol. It was during the interim period that noncompliance tended to occur.
Malaysia, as a country operating under Article 5, paragraph 1, had already
initiated processes for the elimination of CFCs and halons from the aerosol,
solvent, cleaning, refrigeration, air conditioning, fire protection, foam
manufacturing and other sectors. The Implementation Committee was a very
important organ. Malaysia further suggested that its efficiency could be
greatly improved by an equitable distribution of the membership between
developed and developing countries. The delegate of Malaysia said that the
establishment of the Multilateral Fund as a new and additional financial
resource was precedent-setting and it could well be a future model. Malaysia,
as a member of the Executive Committee of the Multilateral Fund, had made a
positive and constructive contribution to the work of the Committee and
faithfully represented the views of other developing countries in the Asian
region.
28. One delegation pointed out that the Amendment to the Protocol, made at
the time of the Second Meeting, was an important contribution to environmental
protection, but had been overtaken by some recent scientific findings, which
necessitated more stringent regulations. Phaseout could of course only be
achieved by a transfer of technology to the developing countries. This
delegation among others was sponsoring a draft resolution, stressing the
urgency of the situation, and hoped that other delegations would rally to its
support. The country's national plan provided for phaseout of all currently
controlled substances to be complete well before 1997. Another most important
issue was the need to provide Assessment Panels with their terms of reference
well in advance, to enable them to organize their work.
29. A nongovernmental organization reported on the establishment and
implementation of control measures in one area of a country in accordance with
Article 2 of the Protocol, which had been revised and updated after the Second
Meeting of the Parties. This had resulted in a 30 per cent reduction in total
consumption of controlled substances in 1990 in the area, corresponding to
- 70 per cent of the 1986 level. The organization stated that this
represented a major effort in the spirit of the Montreal Protocol and wished
to contribute both technically and financially to the global efforts to
protect the ozone layer.
30. The Chairman of the Scientific Assessment Panel, Dr. R.T. Watson, said
that assessments of scientific and environmental impacts and a
technology/economic assessment had been initiated that would provide the
scientific and technical information required as a basis for possible
amendments to the amended Montreal Protocol to be considered by the Parties at
their Fourth Meeting in 1992. The scientific assessment would include a
discussion of: trends in ozone and other chemical constituents both globally
and regionally; comparison of observed and calculated ozone trends; prediction
of atmospheric chlorine loading, ozone depletion and the contribution to
global warming for a number of scenarios concerning CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs and the
space shuttle, and a revised table of ozone depleting and global warming
potentials. The environmental impacts assessed would cover human health (skin
cancer, eye cataracts and suppression of the immune system), terrestrial and
aquatic ecosystems, material damage and tropospheric oxidants. The
technology/economic assessment would review the technical and economic aspects
of substitution of CFCs for refrigerants, foam blowing agents, solvents and
aerosol propellants, and halons. The synthesis document would be completed,
translated in all languages and sent to the printers by
- 1 December 1991. The latest satellite and groundbased ozone data
demonstrated that the rate of ozone depletion at mid and high latitudes in
both hemispheres was greater than previously measured. In addition, current
gasphase photochemical models underestimated by factors of 25 the observed
ozone loss. While the cause of the observed ozone depletion had not been
unequivocally identified, the ozone changes coupled with other atmospheric
data were strongly suggestive of a chlorineinduced effect. The new scientific
data, coupled with simple model calculations of atmospheric chlorine loading,
suggested that the following measures would be required in order to minimize
the projected peak chlorine loading, ozone depletion, elimination of the
Antarctic Ozone hole and the observed midlatitude ozone loss: a reduction in
the emissions of longlived CFCs, CCL4, CH3CCL3 and halons, as soon as
possible, with global compliance; transitional substitution for longlived CFCs
with HCFCs having the shortest possible lifetimes, hence low ODP values; the
recycling of HCFCs to the maximum extent possible, the notinkind substitution
of CFCs wherever practical; phaseout of HCFCs sometime during the next century
(phaseout date should depend upon the atmospheric lifetime of the substitute);
and possible emission rate limitations. Parties should recognize that HCFCs
were not all equal; those with short lifetimes, i.e., 15 years, posed a
significantly lower threat to the ozone layer and global warming than those
with moderate lifetimes, i.e., greater than 15 years.
31. Since one delegation objected to the inclusion of parts of above
paragraph 30, it was agreed that the text should be referred to the Chairman
of the Scientific Assessment Panel for review and any necessary revision.
32. The Chairman of the Implementation Committee, Ms. Bjorklund, recalled
that the Committee had been established to respond quickly to early
indications of noncompliance, with the aim of resolving problems amicably and
obviating the need for recourse to formal arbitration or the International
Court of Justice. This was a new way of solving such conflicts and, if
successful, would set a precedent in the environmental field. However, as the
Brundtland Commission had stressed, all aspects relating to agreements and
mechanisms for dealing with noncompliance needed to be precisely defined. At
its meeting in December 1990 and April 1991, the Implementation Committee had
studied the draft noncompliance procedures developed by the Ad Hoc
Working Group of Legal Experts and had called for central clarifications and
for consideration of new elements for inclusion as outlined in the Committee
reports (documents UNEP/OzL.Pro/Imp.Com.1/2 and 2/3). A number of these issues
were reflected in draft Decision III/2 to be considered by the Parties, but
further guidance from the Parties would be useful. The Implementation
Committee had also examined the data reported in accordance with Article 7 of
the Montreal Protocol and concluded that reporting was not satisfactory: of 71
Parties, only 31 had reported complete data for 1986. Of the remainder,
- 19 had reported incomplete data, 6 had reported no data available and/or
requested assistance, 2 had reported that their data were included in those of
another Party and 13 had not reported data. Of 48 Parties required to report
data for 1989, only 23 had complied by May 1991, and only 20 of these had
submitted complete data. Some developing countries were experiencing serious
reporting problems owing to lack of technical and economic resources. She
noted that the Ad Hoc Working Group of Legal Experts had suggested
several ways of solving these problems, including the establishment of import
control by customs regulations based on a harmonized commodity system.
The Implementation Committee had stressed the need for technical and financial
support to countries to enable them to comply with the provisions of the
Montreal Protocol with regard to data reporting and felt that the Multilateral
Fund was of assistance in this regard. Establishing noncompliance when the
only resource was the lack of such support would only hurt the developing
countries.
33. Discussing the draft decisions recommended for adoption by the
Preparatory Meeting, draft Decision III/2 (Noncompliance procedure), as
amended, was adopted.
34. In regard to draft Decision III/3 (Implementation Committee), two
delegations felt that it was important to clarify that the noncompliance
procedure should be without prejudice to the operation of the settlement of
disputes procedure laid down in Article 11 of the Vienna Convention. Draft
Decision III/3, as amended, was adopted.
35. It was suggested that the Montreal Protocol Handbook (draft
- Decision III/4) might with advantage be made available for sale, and also
that it could be issued in a computerreadable version. The draft decision was
adopted.
36. Draft Decision III/8 (Trade names for Controlled Substances) was
adopted with the amendments recommended by the Bureau. It was recommended that
when the list of trade names had been finalized, it should be annexed, for
reference, to the instruction sheet for the formats for reporting of data.
37. Draft Decision III/10 (Destruction Technologies) was adopted with the
amendments proposed by the Bureau. One delegation drew attention to the large
body of expertise available and recommended the participation of other
experts, perhaps in the capacity of observers.
38. During discussion of draft Decision III/13 (further adjustments to and
amendments of the Protocol) it was agreed that the OpenEnded Working Group
should be requested to submit a report on the proposals to the Fourth Meeting
of the Parties. Some delegates requested clarification in regard to the
position of a country operating under Article 5, paragraph 1 which exceeded
the 0.3 kg ceiling for controlled substances, in particular whether that would
lead to its disqualification. Many delegations believed that the Protocol was
clear on that point. In view of the serious consequences to the Party
concerned, the matter was referred to the OpenEnded Working Group of the
Parties for examination and any recommendations that might be necessary. Draft
Decision III/13, as amended was adopted.
39. The Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Interim Multilateral
Ozone Fund of the Montreal Protocol, Mr. Ilkka Ristimaki, introduced the draft
report of the Fourth Meeting of the Executive Committee
(UNEP/OzL.Pro./ExCom/4/12) and informed the meeting of a number of amendments
that should be reflected in the report.
40. The Chairman summarized the actions and decisions taken by the
Executive Committee with regard to the operation of the Interim Multilateral
Ozone Fund during the first year. The legal basis and the financial
regulations were drawn up in good time to enable the Fund to become effective
from
- 1 January 1991, with Montreal as the venue of its Secretariat. Mr. Omar
ElArini, appointed as Chief Officer, assumed his functions in February 1991
and all staff would have been recruited by the end of 1991. The Executive
Committee had held four meetings, the first in September 1990. He expressed
the Committee's gratitude to UNEP and the Canadian authorities for interim
Secretariat services.
41. The Executive Committee had adopted provisional rules of procedure for
its meetings which were submitted to the meeting of the Parties for
endorsement (document UNEP/OzL.Pro./ExCom/3/18, Annex II). Further, a revised
1991 budget was presented for the adoption of the Parties in the same report
(document UNEP/OzL.Pro./ExCom/3/18, Annex I). The threeyear budget for
19911993 was presented for adoption in two separate documents, the
administrative budget for the Fund Secretariat in document
UNEP/OzL.Pro./ExCom/3/18, Annex IV and the operational budget in document
- UNEP/OzL.Pro./ExCom/4/11/Rev.1. A revised version of the threeyear budget
would need to be prepared and presented to the Parties in the light of the
decision of China to accede to the Protocol. The scale of contributions by
Parties to the Fund required updating to take account of new states not
operating under Article 5, paragraph 1 which had become Parties, the
unification of Germany and the accession by China to the Protocol.
42. The Committee had developed and adopted "Implementation Guidelines and
Criteria for Project Selection" (document UNEP/OzL.Pro./ExCom/3/18,
- Annex III). Each Party was invited to draw up a country programme to serve
as a basis for project operation and financing from the Fund.
43. Tripartite interagency agreements had been signed between UNEP, UNDP
and the World Bank and individual agreements between these agencies and the
Executive Committee were ready for signing. At its fourth meeting the
Executive Committee approved work programmes by the three agencies for 1991.
- The total amounts approved to the agencies as of 18 June 1991: UNEP
US$1,676,920; UNDP US$1,261,800; World Bank US$5,000,000, yielding a total of
US$7,938,720.
44. At its next meeting the Executive Committee would consider country
programmes, separate projects submitted by Parties, possible additional
proposals by the implementing agencies for the 1991 work programmes, and
proposals for the agencies work programmes for 1992 and 1993.
45. The Chairman referred to the terms of reference of the Executive
Committee which stated that the office of chairman was to rotate on an annual
basis between the Parties operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 and the
Parties not so operating. For the annual rotation to take place the two groups
of countries should be invited to select the Chairman and the ViceChairman
accordingly and present their selection to the Parties for endorsement.
46. Referring to the need to revise the scale of contributions, the
Assistant Executive Director proposed that the total amount of contributions
for 1991 agreed by the Second Meeting of the Parties should remain unchanged
but that the total amount of contributions in 1992 and 1993 be increased by
- US$20 million each year, raising the threeyear total from US$160 million
to US$200 million. In accordance with the United Nations regular budget scale
of
- assessment, the percentage contributions of new states will be: Bulgaria
0.15, Czechoslovakia 0.66 and Poland 0.56. The revised percentage contribution
for unified Germany would be 9.36. The contributions for 1992 and 1993 would
be recalculated accordingly. One delegation emphasized the need to take into
consideration the difficulties being experienced by countries undergoing
economic transition, particularly in Eastern and Central Europe.
47. A number of delegations paid tribute to the work of the Executive
Committee and of its Chairman and Vice-Chairman and welcomed the progress
made. One delegation noted the need to develop quickly strategies for funding
country programmes which would maximize available resources. One delegation
clarified that its inkind contributions to the Multilateral Fund would include
transfer of technology, provision of expertise and training. Another
delegation expressed the hope that strategies could be developed and put into
effect quickly so that money earmarked for bilateral and regional projects
could be utilized.
48. The representative of the World Bank welcomed the progress made by the
Executive Committee. Preparatory work in countries not party to the Protocol
had placed the World Bank in a position to respond quickly when those
countries joined, as was the case with China. A number of studies had
identified suitable investment programmes but commitments could not be made
unless funds were available. He therefore emphasized the need for timely
contributions. He drew attention to the possibility of assisting countries not
covered by the Multilateral Fund through the Global Environment Facility.
49. After some discussion, including the approval of certain amendments to
the Rules of Procedure for meetings of the Executive Committee, the Meeting
endorsed the Rules of Procedure as contained in Annex VI of this report, and
adopted decisions concerning the Interim Multilateral Ozone Fund
- (Decision III/22). The revised 1991 budget for the Fund Secretariat was
adopted as contained in Annex VII to this report. The three-year plan and
budget for the Fund Secretariat and the three-year budget for Fund Operations
are contained in Annexes VIII and IX, respectively. The revised scale of
contributions was adopted as contained in Annex X.
50. The Assistant Executive Director introduced the revised budgets for
1991, and proposed budgets for 1992 and 1993 for the Trust Fund for the
Montreal Protocol prepared after consultation with the subgroup set up by the
Preparatory Meeting to consider the matter in detail. Although a number of
changes had been made in individual budget lines, the overall total of the
1991 budget showed no change from that adopted by the Second Meeting of the
Parties and no additional contributions from Parties would be necessary. He
emphasized that the proposed budgets would only be viable if all Parties paid
their contributions as far as possible early in the year. The Parties noted
the status of contributions in 1990 and 1991 as contained in Annex III and the
1990 expenditures as contained in Annex IV to this report. The Parties adopted
a decision on budgets and financial matters (Decision III/21). The revised
1991 budget and the 1992 and 1993 budgets adopted by the Parties are contained
in Annex I to this report and theadopted list of contributions to be made by
the Parties is contained in Annex II of this report.
51. During discussion on the proposed annex to the Montreal Protocol
containing a list of products containing controlled substances, one delegation
expressed doubt regarding the desirability of including portable fire
extinguishers. Another delegation said that their inclusion was necessary in
terms of Article 4, paragraph 3. One delegation raised the possibility of
including transportation refrigeration units. It was pointed out that the
subgroup set up by the Preparatory Meeting had considered that issue but had
recommended that they should not be included in view of the implications for
trade in refrigerated goods, especially foodstuffs. Two delegations felt that
to do so would impinge on sensitive areas covered by GATT. One delegation
requested that the legal position with regard to GATT be clarified. One
delegation stated its understanding from Article 4, paragraphs 3 and 3
bis, that nonParties had the right, at the time of joining, to object
to the annex. The list was adopted, with the title amended to ensure that it
was unambiguous (Decision III/15). The Parties adopted the list as contained
in Annex V of this report. The Secretariat agreed to identify the relevant
Brussels nomenclature numbers as well as those of the Harmonized Commodity
Systems. It was pointed out that the products listed in Annex D could also be
manufactured without containing controlled substances. The Parties emphasized
that the products listed in Annex D are only those that contain controlled
substances.
52. During the discussion on agenda item 8, one delegation stated that the
data reported for his country in accordance with Article 7 had not been
authorized by the Government but had been provided on an unauthorized basis.
Now that the country was a Party to the Montreal Protocol, it would be in a
better position to collect official data. In discussions regarding its country
programme, it had been agreed with the World Bank that clarification of the
data would be sought during implementation of the programme, due to start in
September 1991. He hoped that the matter could be clarified prior to the
Fourth Meeting of the Parties. The Meeting was informed that the Secretariat
would obtain further information from this country.
53. After discussion of a draft decision on assessment panels, an amended
text was adopted (Decision III/12). Some delegations stated that their
countries, in view of their current economic and financial situation, would be
unable to adapt to a more stringent timetable for ozone depleting substances
control than that set out by the Second Meeting of the Parties or to comply
with the obligation to include various transitional substances in the list of
controlled substances.
54. After considering draft Decision III/20 (Composition of the
Implementation Committee), it was decided to retain the present geographical
distribution of members of the Implementation Committee, but to increase the
number to ten. It was also decided to delete the last sentence of paragraph 3
of Annex III (Noncompliance procedure) contained in document UNEP/OzL.Pro.2/3
(Report of the Second Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol) and to
amend the word five to ten in line 2 of the paragraph. One delegation proposed
a consequent amendment to subparagraph (e) of Decision III/3 (Implementation
Committee), confirming the present five members of the Implementation
Committee in office for a further year and calling on the geographical groups
to nominate five further members for election to the Committee for a period of
2 years. Decision III/3 (e) was adopted after the election of the five further
members. Parties should take account of legal and technical expertise when
nominating members. The amendment to Annex III of document UNEP/OzL.Pro.2/3
was adopted.
55. During consideration of the accession of Turkey to the Montreal
Protocol, the Secretariat introduced the Executive Director's explanatory note
on the list of developing countries. On a point of order, one delegation
objected to consideration of the issue, since the Secretariat had not reported
on the administrative and financial implications in accordance with Rule 14 of
the Rules of Procedure. The same delegation mentioned that the note in
question was no more than background information addressed to the Bureau of
the Second Meeting of the Parties and in no way complied with provisions of
Rule 14. The delegation proposed that, as there were serious implications,
consideration be deferred until the Fourth Meeting of the Parties. The
Secretariat explained that the actual implications had been pointed out in the
note and that it had complied with Rule 14. Some delegations commented that
the item had been included in the agenda circulated well before the Meeting
and adopted by the Parties. After some discussion, the Parties agreed to
consider the subject at the Meeting.
56. The delegation of Turkey said that its Government wished to apply for
developing country status on the grounds that it was considered as a
developing country by a number of international organizations, its per capita
GNP was US$1,300 per annum, and its consumption of controlled substances was
only 0.07 kg per capita. A member of the Bureau of the Second Meeting of the
Parties introduced a draft decision recommended by the Bureau for
consideration by the Parties. Many delegations expressed support for the
inclusion of Turkey on the list of developing countries. However, some concern
was expressed in connection with Turkey's application for membership of the
EEC and about reopening the list of developing countries in general. It was
pointed out that countries not eligible for support from the Multilateral Fund
could apply for assistance through the Global Environment Facility. There was
a consensus that the OpenEnded Working Group of the Parties should be
requested to study and further define the criteria to be applied to any new
Party seeking classification as a developing country. One delegation proposed
that consideration be given to a new category to include countries which
neither contributed to nor received support from the Multilateral Fund. The
Meeting adopted Decision III/5.
57. The Rapporteur announced that the Parties operating under Article 5,
paragraph 1, had agreed that the composition of the group of Parties so
operating would be as follows for the second year of the operation of the
Executive Committee: two seats for Latin America and Caribbean, two seats for
Africa and three seats for Asia. The Asian group had selected Sri Lanka as its
third member country in the Committee. Sri Lanka would occupy that seat for
one year after which it would rotate to Africa. In the third year, the
position of the ViceChairman would rotate to the group of Parties operating
under Article 5, paragraph 1 and that group had earmarked Asia for that
position. In the same year Brazil would occupy the seat vacated by Mexico,
which would resign from the Committee after completion of its second year. The
membership from the group of Parties operating under Article 5, paragraph 1,
for the second year would be as follows: Egypt, Ghana, Jordan, Malaysia,
Mexico, Sri Lanka and Venezuela. The membership from that group in the third
year will be as follows: Brazil, Egypt, Ghana, Jordan, Malaysia, Venezuela and
a member to be nominated by the African Group. The Rapporteur further reported
that, as required by the terms of reference for the Executive Committee, the
Group of Parties operating under Article 5, paragraph 1, had selected Mexico
for the post of Chairman of the Executive Committee. A representative of the
Parties not operating under Article 5, Paragraph 1 stated that the members
representing this group of Parties in the Executive Committee would continue
for the second year and that USA has been selected by this group as the
Vice-Chairman of the Executive Committee. The Parties noted the decisions of
the two groups of Parties regarding the composition of the Executive
Committee.
58. During discussion of the date and venue for the Fourth Meeting of the
Parties, the Parties welcomed the announcement by the delegation of Denmark
that its Government wished to host the Meeting. It was agreed that the Fourth
Meeting of the Parties should be convened in September or October 1992
(Decision III/18). The dates would be finalized in cooperation with the
Secretariat and circulated as soon as possible.
V. DECISIONS
59. The Third Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer decided:
Decision III/1. Adjustments and amendment
(a) To bring to the attention of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol the
fact that the Adjustments to the Protocol adopted at the Second Meeting of the
Parties came into effect on 7 March 1991 and to urge them to adopt the
necessary measures to comply with the adjusted control measures; and
(b) To note that only two States have so far ratified the Amendment,
adopted at the Second Meeting of the Parties to the Protocol and to urge all
States to ratify that Amendment in view of the fact that twenty instruments of
ratification, approval or acceptance are required for it to come into force on
1 January 1992;
Decision III/2. Noncompliance Procedure
(a) To request the Ad Hoc Working Group of Legal Experts on the
Noncompliance Procedure with the Montreal Protocol, when elaborating further
the procedures on noncompliance, to:
(i) Identify possible situations of noncompliance with the Protocol;
(ii) Develop an indicative list of advisory and conciliatory measures to
encourage full compliance;
(iii) Reflect the role of the Implementation Committee as an advisory and
conciliatory body bearing in mind that the recommendation of the
Implementation Committee on Non-compliance Procedure must always be referred
to the meeting of the Parties for final decision;
(iv) Reflect the possible need for legal interpretation of the provisions
of the Protocol;
(v) Draw up an indicative list of measures that might be taken by a
meeting of the Parties in respect of Parties that are not in compliance with
the Protocol, bearing in mind the need to provide all assistance possible to
countries, particularly developing countries, to enable them to comply with
the Protocol;
(vi) Endorse the conclusion of the Ad Hoc Working Group of Legal
Experts that the judicial and arbitral settlement of disputes provided for in
Article 11 of the Vienna Convention and the Non-compliance Procedure pursuant
to Article 8 of the Montreal Protocol were two distinct and separate
procedures (UNEP/OzL.Pro/WG.3/2/3);
(b) To adopt the following timetable for finalization of the draft
noncompliance procedures for consideration by the Fourth Meeting of the
Parties to the Protocol:
October 1991: Meeting of the Ad Hoc Working Group of Legal Experts to
complete the draft procedures for endorsement by the Parties;
November 1991: Submission of draft noncompliance procedures to the Ozone
Secretariat;
December 1991: Circulation of draft noncompliance procedures to the Parties;
Decision III/3. Implementation Committee
(a) To note the progress made by the Implementation Committee and to urge
strongly that the Parties that have not yet done so should submit without
delay the data required by the Montreal Protocol;
(b) That those States, not forming part of a regional economic integration
organization, which had reported data jointly in the past should submit
separate data in the future, and do so, if appropriate, in the context of
Decision III/7 (a);
(c) To note that the period for data reporting is 1 January to
31 December (Article 7, paragraph 2) and that the control period is 1 July to
30 June (Article 2, paragraph 1) and to request the Parties to report the
data for both periods;
(d) To endorse the recommendation on the categorization of the developing
countries under paragraph 1 of Article 5:
- "In the light of the figures contained in the report on data
(UNEP/OzL.Pro/WG.2/1/3 and Add.1), the recommendation contained in paragraph
14 (e) of the report of the Ad hocGroup of Experts on the Reporting of
Data (UNEP/OzL.Pro/WG.2/1/4), the Committee determined that the following
developing countries should be temporarily categorized as not operating under
Article 5, paragraph 1: Bahrain, Malta, Singapore and United Arab Emirates.
All other developing countries were considered to be operating under Article
5,
- paragraph 1.";
(e) To confirm the positions of Hungary, Japan, Norway, Trinidad and
Tobago, and Uganda as members of the Implementation Committee for one further
year, and to select Cameroon, Chile, Thailand, USA and USSR for a two year
period;
Decision III/4. Montreal Protocol Handbook
To welcome the efforts of the Secretariat in completing the Montreal
Protocol Handbook, which was prepared by the Secretariat in accordance with
Decision II/7 of the Second Meeting of the Parties, and to request the
Secretariat after further editing, taking into account the comments made in
paragraph 18 of the Report of the Preparatory Meeting for the Third Meeting of
the Parties to the Montreal Protocol (UNEP/OzL.Pro.3/Prep/2), to distribute the
Handbookto all the Parties to the Protocol and the Convention in the
official languages of the United Nations as soon as possible;
Decision III/5. Definition of developing countries
(a) To consider the requests by States for classification as developing
countries on an individual basis as and when they come;
(b) To accept the classification of Turkey as a developing country for the
purposes of the Montreal Protocol, noting that Turkey is classified as a
developing country by the World Bank, OECD and UNDP;
(c) To request the Open-Ended Working Group of the Parties to study and
fully define the criteria which will be applied in the future in case of
applications for classification as a developing country for the purpose of the
Montreal Protocol, and to submit a report for consideration to the Fourth or
Fifth Meeting of the Parties;
Decision III/6. Participation of developing countries
To encourage the participation of representatives of developing countries in
meetings of assessment panels, the Committee on Destruction Technologies, the
Bureau and working groups and in any other meetings convened under the Montreal
Protocol and to provide, as far as possible, financial assistance for such
participation;
Decision III/7. Data Reporting
(a) To note the report of the Ad Hoc Group of Experts on the
Reporting of Data and the suggestions that it contains, especially the
recommendation that developing countries should inform the Secretariat of any
difficulties they face in reporting data, and to invite any Party experiencing
such difficulties to inform the Secretariat, so that suitable measures can be
taken to rectify the situation;
(b) Developing countries with a per capita consumption figure which the
Secretariat estimates at below 0.3 kilograms should be able to meet their
obligation to report 1986 data by informing the Secretariat that they accept
its estimate (UNEP/OzL.Pro/WG.2/1/4, paragraph 14 (e));
Decision III/8. Trade names of controlled substances
(a) To request the Technical and Economic Assessment Panel (operating
under Decision II/13 of the Second Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal
Protocol) to compile a list of full and complete trade names, including any
numerical designations of substances controlled by the Montreal Protocol and
the amended Montreal Protocol, including mixtures containing controlled
substances, and to submit the list to the Secretariat by the end of
- November 1991;
(b) To request the Secretariat to distribute, by the end of March 1992,
the list called for in (a) above, to all the Parties to the Montreal Protocol;
- Decision III/9. Formats for reporting data under
the amended Protocol
To adopt the revised formats for reporting data under the amended Montreal
Protocol, as contained in Annex V of the report of the Third Meeting of the
Parties;
Decision III/10. Destruction Technologies
To note the constitution of the Ad Hoc Technical Advisory Committee on
Destruction Technologies, established by the Second Meeting of the Parties, and
to request the Committee to submit a report to the Secretariat for presentation
to the Fourth Meeting of the Parties, in 1992 at least four months before the
date set for that meeting;
Decision III/11. OpenEnded Working Group of the Parties
(a) To recall Article 5, paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Amendment to the
Montreal Protocol adopted by Decision II/2 of the Parties at its Second
Meeting and reiterate the mandate of the Open-Ended Working Group of the
Parties in accordance with Decision II/15 and request that this work be
intensified;
(b) Should the results obtained by the assessment panels suggest the need
to adjust or amend the Protocol, the Working Group would make recommendations
in time for consideration by the next meeting of the Parties;
(c) To endorse the selection of Mexico and the United Kingdom as
co-Chairmen of the Open-Ended Working Group;
Decision III/12. Assessment Panels
(a) To request the Assessment Panels and in particular the Technology and
Economic Assessment Panel to evaluate, without prejudice to Article 5 of the
Montreal Protocol, the implications, in particular for developing countries,
of the possibilities and difficulties of an earlier phase-out of the
controlled substances, for example of the implications of a 1997 phase-out;
(b) Taking into account the London Resolution on transitional substances
(Annex VII to the report of the Second Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal
Protocol), to identify the specific areas where transitional substances are
required to facilitate the earliest possible phase-out of controlled
substances, taking into account environmental, technological and economic
factors, where no other more environmentally suitable alternatives are
available. The quantities likely to be needed for those areas and for those
areas of application currently served by transitional substances shall both be
assessed;
(c) To request the assessment panels to identify the transitional
substances with the lowest potential for ozone depletion required for those
areas and suggest, if possible, a technically and economically feasible
timetable, indicating associated costs, for the elimination of transitional
substances;
(d) To request the assessment panels to submit their reports in time for
their consideration by the Open-Ended Working Group with a view to their
submission for consideration by the Fourth Meeting of the Parties;
(e) To endorse Decision II/2, paragraph 2, of the Second Meeting of the
Conference of the Parties to the Vienna Convention.
- Decision III/13. Further adjustments to and
amendments of the Montreal Protocol
To request the OpenEnded Working Group of the Parties, to consider the
following proposals which are aimed at possibly amending the Montreal Protocol
and to submit a report on these proposals to the Fourth Meeting of the Parties:
(a) Article 7, paragraph 5 (of the amended Protocol):
- "In cases of trans-shipment of controlled substances through a third
country (as opposed to imports and subsequent reexports), the country of
origin of the controlled substances shall be regarded as the exporter and the
country of final destination shall be regarded as the importer. In such cases,
the responsibility for reporting data shall lie with the country of origin as
the exporter and the country of final destination as the importer. Cases of
import and reexport should be treated as two separate transactions; the
country of origin would report shipment to the country of intermediate
destination, which would subsequently report the import from the country of
origin and export to the country of final destination, while the country of
final destination would report the import.";
(b) To review all relevant articles of the Montreal Protocol in order to
consider the possible consequences of a country which is operating under
Article 5, paragraph 1 of the Protocol, exceeding the consumption ceiling of
0.3 kilograms per capita specified in that Article;
(c) To discuss measures including possible amendments to the Protocol to
clarify the situations of such a Party with respect to the Article 2 control
measures and in particular to specify:
- The base year which should apply to such a Party for the purpose of the
reduction schedule;
- The stage of the reduction schedule with which it should be in compliance;
- What (if any) period should be allowed to the Party to enable it to comply
fully with the control measures;
(d) To consider the possible implications of a Party losing its
Article 5 (1) status if it is at the time a member of the Executive Committee
of the Interim Multilateral Fund;
Decision III/14. Amendment of the Rules of Procedure
To amend the Rules of Procedure as follows:
(a) Rule 23 delete paragraph 2;
(b) Rule 24 delete the words "other than the President", and substitute
the words "of the Bureau."
Decision III/15. Annex to the Montreal Protocol
(a) To adopt as an Annex D to the Montreal Protocol, in accordance with
the procedure laid down in Article 10 of the Vienna Convention, the list of
products containing controlled substances. The annex is contained in Annex XI
of the report of the Third Meeting of the Parties;
(b) To request the Secretariat to identify the Customs Code Numbers for
the items on the list from the Customs Co-operation Council. The Customs Code
Numbers will be submitted for acceptance by the Fourth Meeting of the Parties;
Decision III/16. Trade Issues
To encourage the Parties to inform the Secretariat of the implementation of
Article 4 of the Protocol;
Decision III/17. Amendment of the Vienna Convention
To request the Ad Hoc Working Group of Legal Experts on Non-compliance
with the Montreal Protocol to consider procedures for expediting the amendment
procedure under Article 9 of the Vienna Convention;
Decision III/18. Fourth Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol
To convene the Fourth Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol in
September or October 1992 in Denmark;
Decision III/19. Financial Mechanism
To request the Open-Ended Working Group of the Parties to review the
indicative list of the categories of incremental costs adopted by the Parties in
Decision II/8 and, taking into account the experience gained by the Executive
Committee, to develop an indicative list of categories of incremental costs
required by paragraph 1 of Article 10 of the Montreal Protocol as amended by the
Second Meeting of the Parties. The list so developed should be submitted for
consideration by the Fourth Meeting of the Parties;
Decision III/20. Composition of the Implementation Committee
To change paragraph 3 of Non-compliance Procedure as in Annex III to the
report of the Second Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol:
"3. An Implementation Committee is hereby established. It shall consist of
ten Parties elected by the Meeting of the Parties for two years, based on
equitable geographical distribution. Outgoing Parties may also be
re-elected for one immediate consecutive term.";
Decision III/21. Budgets and Financial Matters
(a) To request the Secretariat to submit as soon as possible to all
Parties certified and audited accounts of the Montreal Protocol Trust Fund for
the expenditures under the Fund for the 1990 financial year;
(b) To request the Secretariat to submit to the Parties the certified and
audited accounts for 1989 of the Interim Ozone Secretariat;
(c) To request the Secretariat to submit certified and audited accounts
for subsequent years prior to regular meetings of the Parties;
(d) To emphasize that expenditures incurred due to recommendations by the
Bureau should only be met either within the budget adopted by the Parties for
that year or by other additional contributions made towards these
expenditures;
(e) To emphasize that it is essential to avoid increases in already
adopted budgets in the years to which they relate;
(f) To urge all Parties to pay their outstanding contributions promptly
and to also pay their future contributions promptly and in full in accordance
with the terms of reference and the formula for contributions as attached to
as Annex II to the report of the Third Meeting of the Parties;
(g) To adopt the final budget for 1992 of US$2,278,645, and for 1993 of
US$2,398,990, as set out in Annex I to the report of the Third Meeting of the
Parties;
Decision III/22. Executive Committee of the Multilateral Fund
(a) To adopt the revised 1991 budget for the Fund Secretariat as contained
in Annex VII to the report of the Third Meeting of the Parties;
(b) To endorse the Rules of Procedure as contained in Annex VI to the
report of the Third Meeting of the Parties;
(c) To adopt the budget for 1992, included in the threeyear budget for the
Fund Secretariat as contained in Annex VIII to the report of the Third Meeting
of the Parties;
(d) To endorse the proposal to raise the total amount of the Interim
Multilateral Fund by US$40 million to US$200 million over the three-year
period 19911993;
(e) Adopt a revised scale of contributions set out in Annex X to the
report of the Third Meeting of the Parties;
(f) To endorse the selection of Mexico to act as Chairman and of the
United States of America to act as ViceChairman for the second year of the
Executive Committee.
VI. OTHER MATTERS
60. The representative of Switzerland drew attention to the following
statement by the Heads of delegations representing the Governments of Sweden,
Finland, Norway, Switzerland, Austria, Germany and Denmark (replacing the
draft resolution proposed in document UNEP/OzL.Pro.3/CRP.2):
- "We, the heads of delegations of Sweden, Finland, Norway, Switzerland,
Austria, Germany and Denmark, believe that the recent analysis of the state of
the stratospheric ozone layer calls for the adoption of more stringent control
measures at the Fourth Meeting of the Parties in 1992.
- We are also of the opinion that the substitution of the controlled
substances with transitional substances must be as moderate and temporary as
possible.
- We note that the London resolution urges the adoption, in accordance with
the spirit of the paragraph 11 of Article 2 of the Protocol, of more stringent
measures in order to protect the Ozone Layer.
- Because of this we express our firm determination to phaseout the
production and the consumption of CFCs, halons and carbon tetrachloride
controlled by the Montreal Protocol, as soon as possible but not later than
the year 1997 and to phaseout 1,1,1trichloroethane (methyl chloroform) as soon
as possible but not later than the year 2000. We also think it is necessary to
tighten the timetable agreed upon in the Montreal Protocol taking due account
of the special situation of developing countries.
- We are also determined to limit by no later than 1995 the use of
transitional substances (HCFCs) to specific key applications where other more
environmentally suitable alternative substances or technologies are not
available, and to phaseout their use in those areas as soon as technically
feasible."
61. The delegation of the Netherlands expressed sympathy with the above
statement but commented that the action programme in force in its country
would probably result in levels of reduction similar to those described in the
above statement and that endorsement of the statement would preclude
discussions on more stringent controls currently taking place with
- representatives of industry at the national level. An annual report on the
phaseout programme was published and could be made available to interested
Parties.
62. One delegation suggested that the agenda for the next meeting of the
Parties should include an item covering the status of the reporting of
activities by individual countries in compliance with the requirements of
articles 4 and 9 of the Montreal Protocol.
63. The delegate of Germany informed the Meeting that the Federal
Government was currently preparing a conference to be held from 24 to 26
February 1992 in Berlin, at which, inter alia, the results of the
research activities supported by Germany would be presented. The conference
was intended to provide an opportunity for an international exchange of
information and experience, which should also be of special interest to
developing countries. The results would be published in the form of conference
proceedings (also in English). This report would be made available to
interested parties, not restricted to participants in the conference.
VII. ADOPTION OF THE REPORT
64. The Meeting adopted the present report, on the basis of the draft
report contained in documents UNEP/OzL.Pro.3/L.4 and /L.4 Add.1, 2, 3 and 4,
at its closing session on 21 June 1991.
VIII. CLOSURE OF THE MEETING
65. After the usual exchange of courtesies, the President declared the
Meeting closed.
ANNEX I
MONTREAL PROTOCOL TRUST FUND BUDGETS FOR THE SECRETARIAT REVISED 1991 AND
1992 AND 1993 (US DOLLARS)
w/m 1991 w/m 1992 w/m 1993 GRAND TOTAL
10 PROJECT PERSONNEL COMPONENT
1100 Project personnel (a) (Title & Grade)
1101 Secretary (Coordinator) (D1)(*) 4.5 45,000 6 54,000 6 56,000 155,000
(Shared with VC)
1102 Deputy Secretary (Lawyer) (P4/5) 0 0 12 96,000 12 96,000 192,000
1103 Programme Officer (Lawyer) (P3) 5 41,000 12 75,000 12 77,000 193,000
1104 Programme Officer (Chemist/ 3 19,000 6 43,000 6 38,500 100,500
(Env Scientist) (Shared with VC)(P3/4)
1105 Administrative Officer (P2/3) 5.5 32,080 6 30,000 6 32,000 94,080
(Shared with VC)
1199 Total 137,080 298,000 299,500 734,580
1200 Consultants (b)
1201 Assistance in data reporting 80,000 90,000 100,000 270,000
1299 Total 80,000 90,000 100,000 270,000
1300 Administrative support (Title & Grade)
1301 Administrative Assistant (G7) 6 6,500 6 7,000 6 7,500 21,000
(Shared with VC)
1302 Senior Secretary (G6) 12 12,000 12 12,000 12 13,000 37,000
1303 Secretary (shared with VC) (G6) 0 0 6 6,000 6 6,500 12,500
1304 Secretary (shared with VC) (G6) 0 0 6 6,000 6 6,500 12,500
1320 Temporary assistance 5,000 0 0 5,000
1321 CSC (conference servicing costs) for 170,000 0 0 170,000
3rd Meeting of the Parties (1991) ©
1322 CSC Prep Meeting for Parties Meeting (1991) © 145,000 0 0 145,000
1323 CSC WG Meetings (3) © 420,000 0 0 420,000
1324 CSC Meetings of the Bureau (2) © 65,000 0 0 65,000
1325 CSC Meetings of the assessment panels © 24,000 0 0 24,000
w/m 1991 w/m 1992 w/m 1993 GRAND TOTAL
1326 CSC Meetings of the Committees (3) © 30,000 0 0 30,000
1331 CSC 4th Meeting of the Parties (1992) © 0 165,000 0 165,000
1332 CSC Prep Meeting for Parties Meeting (1992) © 0 165,000 0 165,000
1333 CSC WG Meetings (2) © 0 350,000 0 350,000
1334 CSC Meetings of the Bureau (2) © 0 68,000 0 68,000
1335 CSC Meetings of the Committees (4) © 0 30,000 0 30,000
1336 CSC Informal Consultation meetings (2) © 0 15,000 0 15,000
1341 CSC 5th Meeting of the Parties (1993) © 0 0 136,000 136,000
1342 CSC Prep Meeting for Parties Meeting (1993) © 0 0 136,000 136,000
1343 CSC WG Meetings (2) © 0 0 377,000 377,000
1344 CSC Meetings of the Bureau (2) © 0 0 74,000 74,000
1345 CSC Meetings of the Committees (4) © 0 0 33,000 33,000
1346 CSC Informal Consultation meetings (2) © 0 0 20,000 20,000
1399 Total 877,500 824,000 809,500 2,511,000
1600 Travel on official business (d)
1601 Travel & subsistence (Secretariat staff) 60,000 65,000 70,000
195,000
1602 Travel & subsistence (UNEP Conf Servc Staff) 20,000 25,000 30,000
75,000
1699 Total 80,000 90,000 100,000 270,000
1999 Component total 1,174,580 1,302,000 1,309,000 3,785,580
30 MEETING COMPONENT
3300 Meetings/conferences, etc. (e)
3301 Participants (DC) to 3rd Meeting of Parties 90,000 0 0 90,000
in 1991 (shared with 3 other MP and VC mtgs)
3302 Participants (DC) to Prep Meetings for 1991 43,000 0 0 43,000
3rd Parties Meeting (shared with 3 other MP
and VC meetings)
3303 Participants (DC) to WG Meetings in 1991 180,000 0 0 180,000
(3 mtg x 15 participants x $ 4,000)
3304 Participants (DC) to Bureau Meetings in 1991 16,000 0 0 16,000
(2 mtgs x 2 x $ 4,000)
3305 Participants (DC) to Meetings of the Assess 240,000 0 0 240,000
ment Panels in 1991 (estimate)
3306 Participants (DC) to Committee Meetings in 40,000 0 0 40,000
1991 (total estimate for 10 partts at $ 4,000)
3311 Participants (DC) to 4th Meeting of Parties 0 100,000 0 100,000
in 1992 (40 part x $ 5,000 shared with prep
meeting)
3312 Participants (DC) to Prep Meetings for 1992 0 100,000 0 100,000
4th Part Mtg (40 x $ 5,000 shared with parties
meeting)
3313 Participants (DC) to WG Meetings in 1992 0 200,000 0 200,000
(2 mtgs x 20 partts x $ 5,000)
w/m 1991 w/m 1992 w/m 1993 GRAND TOTAL
3314 Participants (DC) to Bureau Meetings in 1992 0 30,000 0 30,000
(2 mtgs x 3 partts x $ 5,000)
3315 Participants (DC) to Committee Meetings in 0 50,000 0 50,000
1992 (total estimate for 10 partts at $ 5,000)
3321 Participants (DC) to 5th Meeting of Parties 0 0 120,000 120,000
in 1993 (40 parts x $ 6,000 x 1.5 wks shared
with prep meeting and VC)
3322 Participants (DC) to Prep Meetings for 1993 0 0 120,000 120,000
5th Part Mtg (40 partts x $ 6,000 x 1.5 wks shared
with Parties meeting and VC)
3323 Participants (DC) to WG Meetings in 1993 0 0 240,000 240,000
(2 mtgs x 20 partts x $ 6,000)
3324 Participants (DC) to Bureau Meetings in 1993 0 0 36,000 36,000
(2 mtgs x 3 partts x $ 6,000)
3325 Participants (DC) to Committee Meetings in 0 0 60,000 60,000
1993 (total estimate for 10 partts at $ 6,000)
3399 Total 609,000 480,000 576,000 1,665,000
3999 Component total 609,000 480,000 576,000 1,665,000
40 EQUIPMENT AND PREMISES COMPONENT
4100 Expendable equipment (item under $500) (f)
4101 Miscellaneous expendables 5,000 7,500 10,000 22,500
4199 Total 5,000 7,500 10,000 22,500
4200 Nonexpendable equipment (g)
4201 Personal computers (4) (shared with VC) 8,000 16,000 0 24,000
4202 Photocopiers (2) (shared with VC) 10,000 0 0 10,000
4203 Telefax machine (1) (shared with VC) 3,000 0 0 3,000
4204 Portable computers (3) (shared with VC) 10,000 5,000 0 15,000
4299 Total 31,000 21,000 0 52,000
4999 Component total 36,000 28,500 10,000 74,500
50 MISCELLANEOUS COMPONENT
5100 Operation and maintenance of equipment (h)
5101 Maintenance of equipment 2,000 6,000 8,000 16,000
5199 Total 2,000 6,000 8,000 16,000
w/m 1991 w/m 1992 w/m 1993 GRAND TOTAL
5200 Reporting costs (i)
5201 Reporting (general) 30,000 35,000 40,000 105,000
5202 Reporting (Technical Assessment Panels) 135,000 0 0 135,000
5299 Total 165,000 35,000 40,000 240,000
5300 Sundry (j)
5301 Communications 15,000 25,000 30,000 70,000
5302 Freight charges (shipment of documents) 10,000 15,000 20,000 45,000
5303 Others 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000
5399 Total 30,000 45,000 55,000 130,000
5400 Hospitality (k)
5401 Hospitality 15,000 20,000 25,000 60,000
5499 Total 15,000 20,000 25,000 60,000
5999 Component total 212,000 106,000 128,000 446,000
99 SUBTOTAL 2,031,580 1,916,500 2,023,000 5,971,080
Contingency (l) 112,668 100,000 100,000 312,668
Programme support costs (13%) 278,752 262,145 275,990 816,887
GRAND TOTAL 2,423,000 2,278,645 2,398,990 7,100,635
============================================================================================================================
NB (*) The post of Coordinator (Lawyer) in the budget approved by the Parties
to the Vienna Convention in the 1st
meeting in Helsinki in April 1989 is the same as that of Secretary
(Coordinator) in the budget approved by
the Parties to the Montreal Protocol in the 2nd meeting in London in 1990
where also the post was raised
to the level of D1.
(a) The Coordinator and the Administrative Officer joined the Secretariat
in March and February 1991 respectively and the Scientist will join the
Secretariat on 1 July 1991. One programme officer
will join the Secretariat in August while the other will do so in January
1992.
NB (*) continues
(b) Consultancy to provide assistance to countries in the area of data
reporting has been singled out for increased attention and the budget is the
Secretariat's best calculation of the activities requirements.
(c) Conference servicing costs calculated as follows:
1991 preparatory meeting and the third parties meeting based on currently
obligated quotations
for back to back meetings of Governing Council, Vienna Convention, Montreal
Protocol and
Biodiversity in six languages inclusive of $ 23,000 for Montreal Protocol
presession documents
divided equally between the preparatory and parties meetings.
- bureau meetings also partly based on quotations as the above preparatory
meeting and partly on costs for 2 days interpretation, administrative support
and 100 pages documents
preparation into three languages.
- technical assessment panel meetings cost estimate is an allowance for
administrative support which may be needed by any of the various technical
assessment panel meetings currently
ongoing worldwide.
- working group meetings costs based on a conference services cost in 6
languages for three days and without any back to back arrangement with other
meetings and no allowance for
longer than normal working hours for the interpretation.
- three committee meetings requiring $14,000 for 100 pages of document
preparation into one language and $ 10,000 in administrative support.
1992 the preparatory and parties meetings will be convened back to back with
only each other and
are each calculated based on $ 42,000 for 125 pages documents preparation in
six languages and
six languages interpretation (inclusive of administrative support and in
session and
post session documentation costing $ 121,000.
- the two Working Group meetings are each estimated at $ 35,000 for 100
pages documents preparation in six languages and three days six languages
interpretation inclusive of
administrative support and insession and postsession documentation costing $
140,000.
- two bureau meetings each based on the assumption that three languages will
be required for 50 pages documents preparation and 2 days meeting
interpretation (including administrative support) costed
at $ 7,000 and $ 27,000 respectively.
- the four committees meetings calculated at a total cost of $ 20,000 for
150 pages documents preparation English and administrative support of $
10,000.
- the two informal consultation meetings are each calculated at $ 5,000 for
100 pages of documents preparation in English and $ 2,500 for administrative
support.
1993 the preparatory and parties meetings will be convened back to back with
only each other and
together with the parties meeting for the Vienna Convention and are each
calculated based on
$ 46,000 for 125 pages documents preparation in six languages and six
languages interpretation
(inclusive of administrative support and in session and postseesion
documentation costing $ 90,000.
- the two Working Group meetings are each estimated at $ 37,500 for 125
pages documents preparation in six languages and three days six languages
interpretation inclusive of
administrative support and insession and postsession documentation costing $
150,000.
- two bureau meetings each based on the assumption that three languages will
be required for 50 pages documents preparation and 2 days meeting
interpretation (including administrative support) costed
at $ 8,000 and $ 29,000 respectively.
- the four committees meetings are each calculated at $ 22,000 for 150 pages
documents preparation in
- English and administrative support of $ 11,000.
- the two informal consultation meetings are each calculated at $ 15,000 for
100 pages of documents preparation in English and $ 5,000 for administrative
support.
NB (*) continues
(d) 1991 based on commitments and 1992 and 1993 based on previous
estimated for 15 Ozone staff travels and 5 UNEP conference servicing staff per
year.
(e) Participation cost of developing countries worked out as follows:
1991 based on quotation of the 60 participants distributed invariably among
the Montreal Protocol and
the Vienna Convention preparatory and parties meetings as well as the
Executive Committee meeting and
as shared between them appropriately.
- participation costs to the two bureau meeting based on commitments.
- the three working group meetings participation cost calculated on the
basis of 15 participants per meeting and the cost per participant is $ 4,000.
- there will be a total of 10 participants from the developing countries for
the four committees meetings meetings costing a total of $ 40,000 at $ 4,000
each.
- the assessment panel meetings participation is calculated on the basis of
60 participants each costing $ 4,000.
- US $ 4,000 per participant has been used as a base for the calculation of
the 1991 costs for travel and subsistence for participants to meetings lasting
for a period of a week.
1992 the preparatory and parties meeting are based on an estimated number of
40 participants each costing
$ 5,000 and shared equally between them.
- participation costs to the bureau meeting assumes 3 participants from
developing countries to each of the two meetings and each costing $ 5,000.
- the two working group meetings participation cost calculated on the basis
of 15 participants per meeting and the cost per participant is $ 5,000.
- there will be a total of 10 participants from the developing countries for
the four committees meetings meetings costing a total of $ 50,000 at $ 5,000
each.
- US $ 5,000 per participant has been used as a base for the calculation of
the 1991 costs for travel and subsistence for participants to meetings lasting
for a period of a week.
1993 the preparatory and parties meeting are based on an estimated number of
40 participants each costing
$ 6,000 per week and for a one week and a half and shared equally between
them and also the Vienna
the Vienna Convention parties meeting.
- participation costs to the bureau meeting assumes 3 participants from
developing countries to each of the two meetings and each costing $ 6,000.
- the two working group meetings participation cost calculated on the basis
of 15 participants per meeting and the cost per participant is $ 6,000.
- there will be a total of 10 participants from the developing countries for
the four committees meetings meetings costing a total of $ 60,000 at $ 6,000
each.
- US $ 6,000 per participant has been used as a base for the calculation of
the 1991 costs for travel and subsistence for participants to meetings lasting
for a period of a week.
(f) An estimated cost of office expendables.
(g) Equipment costs estimated based on models compatible with UNEP
standards.
(h) Estimate based on existing UNEP maintenance contracts.
NB (*) continues
(i) Estimate based on the Montreal Protocol activities needs and the
Technical Assessment Panel's needs.
(j) Estimate based on experience of the Secretariat in carrying out the
activities of the Montreal Protocol.
(k) Estimate based on past experience of the Secretariat.
(l) In 1991 the contingency has been calculated as the difference between
the current revised budget and the budget adopted at the Second Parties
meeting for the year. In 1992 and 1993, it is calculated
on a percentage basis using around 5% of that year's budget.
ANNEX II
PLEDGED CONTRIBUTIONS BY PARTIES TOWARDS THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL TRUST FUND
FOR 1992 AND 1993
|||||
| | %AGE BASED ON | 1992 PLEDGES | 1993 PLEDGES |
| COUNTRY | UN SCALE WITH | IN | IN |
| | 25% CEILING | US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS |
|||||
| Argentina | 0.68% | 15,485 | 16,303 |
| Australia | 1.62% | 36,837 | 38,782 |
| Austria | 0.76% | 17,362 | 18,279 |
| Bahrain | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Bangladesh | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Belgium | 1.20% | 27,452 | 28,901 |
| Brazil | 1.49% | 34,021 | 35,818 |
| Bulgaria | 0.15% | 3,519 | 3,705 |
| Burkina Faso | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Byelorussian S.S.R. | 0.34% | 7,743 | 8,152 |
| Cameroon | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Canada | 3.18% | 72,500 | 76,329 |
| Chile | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Czechoslovakia | 0.68% | 15,485 | 16,303 |
| Denmark | 0.71% | 16,189 | 17,044 |
| Ecuador | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Egypt | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Fiji | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Finland | 0.53% | 11,966 | 12,598 |
| France | 6.44% | 146,643 | 154,387 |
| Gambia | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Germany, F.R. | 9.64% | 219,612 | 231,211 |
| Ghana | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Greece | 0.41% | 9,385 | 9,881 |
| Guatemala | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Hungary | 0.22% | 4,927 | 5,187 |
| Iceland | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Iran | 0.71% | 16,189 | 17,044 |
| Ireland | 0.19% | 4,223 | 4,446 |
| Italy | 4.11% | 93,617 | 98,561 |
| Japan | 11.72% | 267,007 | 281,109 |
| Jordan | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Kenya | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Libyan Arab Jamahiriya | 0.29% | 6,570 | 6,917 |
| Liechtenstein | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Luxembourg | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Malawi | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Malaysia | 0.11% | 2,581 | 2,717 |
| Maldives | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Malta | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Mexico | 0.97% | 22,055 | 23,220 |
| Netherlands | 1.70% | 38,714 | 40,758 |
| New Zealand | 0.25% | 5,631 | 5,928 |
| Nigeria | 0.21% | 4,693 | 4,940 |
| Norway | 0.57% | 12,905 | 13,586 |
| Panama | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Poland | 0.58% | 13,139 | 13,833 |
| Portugal | 0.19% | 4,223 | 4,446 |
| Singapore | 0.11% | 2,581 | 2,717 |
| South Africa | 0.46% | 10,558 | 11,116 |
| Spain | 2.01% | 45,753 | 48,169 |
| Sri Lanka | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Sweden | 1.25% | 28,390 | 29,889 |
| Togo | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Tunisia | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
|||||
|||||
| | %AGE BASED ON | 1992 PLEDGES | 1993 PLEDGES |
| COUNTRY | UN SCALE WITH | IN | IN |
| | 25% CEILING | US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS |
|||||
| Uganda | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Ukrainian S.S.R. | 1.29% | 29,329 | 30,877 |
| Switzerland | 1.11% | 25,340 | 26,678 |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Thailand | 0.10% | 2,346 | 2,470 |
| U.S.S.R. | 10.29% | 234,394 | 246,773 |
| United Arab Emirates | 0.20% | 4,458 | 4,693 |
| United Kingdom | 5.00% | 114,029 | 120,052 |
| United States | 25.00% | 569,661 | 599,748 |
| Uruguay | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| Venezuela | 0.59% | 13,374 | 14,080 |
| Yugoslavia | 0.47% | 10,793 | 11,363 |
| Zambia | 0.00% | 0 | 0 |
| | | | |
| EEC | 2.50% | 56,966 | 59,975 |
| | | | |
|========================|===============|===============|===============|
| TOTAL | 100.00% | 2,278,645 | 2,398,990 |
|========================|===============|===============|===============|
ANNEX III
STATUS OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY PARTIES TOWARDS THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL TRUST FUND
FOR 1990 AND 1991
( 31 MAY 1991 )
|| || ||
| | | 1 9 9 0 | | 1 9 9 1 |
| COUNTRY | |||| ||||
| | | AGREED | PAYMENTS MADE | OUTSTANDING | | AGREED | PAYMENTS MADE |
OUTSTANDING |
| | |CONTRIBUTIONS | IN | PAYMENTS | |CONTRIBUTIONS | IN | PAYMENTS |
| | |IN US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS | IN US DOLLARS| |IN US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS
| IN US DOLLARS |
|| |||| ||||
| Argentina | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 15,806 | 0 | 15,806 |
| Australia | | 41,311 | 41,311 | 0 | | 41,195 | 16,790 | 24,405 |
| Austria | | 19,440 | 19,440 | 0 | | 19,417 | 7,945 | 11,472 |
| Bahrain | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bangladesh | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Belgium | | 30,861 | 12,001 | 18,860 | | 30,699 | 0 | 30,699 |
| Brazil* | | 38,152 | 0 | 38,152 | | 38,046 | 0 | 38,046 |
| Bulgaria** | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 3,444 | 0 | 3,444 |
| Burkina Faso | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Byelorussian S.S.R. | | 8,748 | 3,385 | 5,363 | | 8,659 | 0 | 8,659 |
| Cameroon | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Canada | | 81,406 | 31,694 | 49,712 | | 81,077 | 0 | 81,077 |
| Chile | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Czechoslovakia | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 17,318 | 0 | 17,318 |
| Denmark | | 18,225 | 15,077 | 3,148 | | 18,105 | 0 | 18,105 |
| Ecuador | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Egypt | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fiji | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Finland | | 13,365 | 13,365 | 0 | | 13,382 | 5,584 | 7,798 |
| France | | 164,514 | 164,514 | 0 | | 163,991 | 68,357 | 95,634 |
| Gambia | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Germany, F.R.*** | | 246,406 | 246,406 | 0 | | 245,593 | 173,464 | 72,129 |
| Ghana | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Greece | | 10,449 | 10,449 | 0 | | 10,495 | 3,774 | 6,721 |
| Iran | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 16,525 | 0 | 16,525 |
| Ireland | | 4,617 | 4,617 | 0 | | 4,723 | 6,833 | (2,110) |
| Italy | | 104,978 | 0 | 104,978 | | 104,692 | 0 | 104,692 |
| Japan | | 299,381 | 299,381 | 0 | | 298,595 | 124,432 | 174,163 |
| Jordan | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kenya | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Libyan Arab Jamahiriya*| | 1,839 | 0 | 1,839 | | 7,347 | 0 | 7,347 |
|| |||| ||||
|| || ||
| | | 1 9 9 0 | | 1 9 9 1 |
| COUNTRY | |||| ||||
| | | AGREED | PAYMENTS MADE | OUTSTANDING | | AGREED | PAYMENTS MADE |
OUTSTANDING |
| | |CONTRIBUTIONS | IN | PAYMENTS | |CONTRIBUTIONS | IN | PAYMENTS |
| | |IN US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS | IN US DOLLARS| |IN US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS
| IN US DOLLARS |
|| |||| ||||
| Guatemala | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hungary | | 5,589 | 5,589 | 0 | | 5,510 | 2,149 | 3,361 |
| Iceland | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Liechtenstein | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Luxembourg | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malawi | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malaysia | | 2,916 | 0 | 2,916 | | 2,886 | 0 | 2,886 |
| Maldives | | 1,500 | 1,500 | 0 | | 1,500 | 1,500 | 0 |
| Malta | | 9,988 | 9,988 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mexico | | 24,786 | 20,509 | 4,277 | | 24,664 | 0 | 24,664 |
| Netherlands | | 43,498 | 43,498 | 0 | | 43,294 | 61,348 | (18,054) |
| New Zealand | | 6,318 | 6,318 | 0 | | 6,297 | 8,948 | (2,651) |
| Nigeria | | 5,346 | 0 | 5,346 | | 5,248 | 0 | 5,248 |
| Norway | | 14,580 | 14,580 | 0 | | 14,431 | 23,412 | (8,981) |
| Panama | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Poland* | | 3,678 | 1,802 | 1,876 | | 14,694 | 0 | 14,694 |
| Portugal | | 4,617 | 4,617 | 0 | | 4,723 | 264 | 4,459 |
| Singapore | | 2,916 | 1,128 | 1,788 | | 2,886 | 0 | 2,886 |
| South Africa* | | 11,907 | 11,907 | 0 | | 11,807 | 4,746 | 7,061 |
| Spain | | 51,274 | 51,274 | 0 | | 51,165 | 18,447 | 32,718 |
| Sri Lanka | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sweden | | 31,833 | 25,911 | 5,922 | | 31,749 | 0 | 31,749 |
| Switzerland | | 28,431 | 28,431 | 0 | | 28,338 | 28,338 | 0 |
| Syrian Arab Republic | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thailand | | 2,673 | 2,673 | 0 | | 2,624 | 883 | 1,741 |
| Togo | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tunisia | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Uganda | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ukrainian S.S.R. | | 32,806 | 12,821 | 19,985 | | 32,798 | 0 | 32,798 |
| U.S.S.R. | | 262,930 | 102,465 | 160,465 | | 262,124 | 0 | 262,124 |
| United Arab Emirates* | | 5,103 | 0 | 5,103 | | 4,985 | 0 | 4,985 |
| United Kingdom | | 127,820 | 127,820 | 0 | | 127,520 | 127,520 | 0 |
| United States | | 607,509 | 135,000 | 472,509 | | 605,750 | 30,000 |
575,750 |
| Uruguay | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|| |||| ||||
|| || ||
| | | 1 9 9 0 | | 1 9 9 1 |
| COUNTRY | |||| ||||
| | | AGREED | PAYMENTS MADE | OUTSTANDING | | AGREED | PAYMENTS MADE |
OUTSTANDING |
| | |CONTRIBUTIONS | IN | PAYMENTS | |CONTRIBUTIONS | IN | PAYMENTS |
| | |IN US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS | IN US DOLLARS| |IN US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS
| IN US DOLLARS |
|| |||| ||||
| Venezuela | | 15,066 | 5,846 | 9,220 | | 14,956 | 0 | 14,956 |
| Yugoslavia** | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 9,053 | 0 | 9,053 |
| Zambia | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| EEC | | 60,751 | 60,751 | 0 | | 60,575 | 16,337 | 44,238 |
| | | | | | | | | |
|========================| |==============|===============|==============|
|==============|===============|===============|
| TOTAL | | 2,447,527 | 1,536,068 | 911,459 | | 2,508,686 | 731,071 |
1,777,615 |
|========================| |==============|===============|==============|
|==============|===============|===============|
NB: (*) New Parties who ratified during 1990.
(**) New Parties who ratified during 1991 and their contributions have been
calculated on a prorata basis for
remaining period.
(***) The contributions of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German
Democratic Republic have been combined.
The 1990 figure is comprised of $33,778 and $ 212,628, while the 1991 figure
is comprised of $ 33,585
and $212,008.
ANNEX IV
1990 EXPENDITURES FOR THE TRUST FUND FOR THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES
THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER
|||
| BL Items | (US DOLLARS) |
|||
| | |
| 10 PROJECT PERSONNEL COMPONENT | |
| | |
| 1100 Project personnel | |
| Advertisements | 4,199 |
| 1200 Consultancies | |
| Data reporting | 26,391 |
| 1300 Administrative support | |
| General Service staff | 7,720 |
| Second Meeting of the Parties | 76,073 |
| Working Group Meetings | 284,842 |
| Bureau Meetings | 5,658 |
| Informal Consultation Meeting | 91,750 |
| OpenEnded WG Meeting | 121,793 |
| Data Reporting Meeting | 6,210 |
| Implementation Committee Meeting | 617 |
| 1600 Travel on official business | |
| Ozone Secretariat staff | 45,093 |
| UNEP Conference Servicing Staff | 58,936 |
| | |
| 1999 Component total | 729,282 |
| | |
| 30 PARTICIPATION COMPONENT | |
| | |
| 3300 Developing Countries participation | |
| Participtn at informal meeting | 18,678 |
| | |
| 3999 Component total | 18,678 |
| | |
| 40 EQUIPMENT COMPONENT | |
| | |
| 4200 Nonexpendable equipment | |
| Photocopier & personal computer | 6,908 |
| | |
| 4999 Component total | 6,908 |
| | |
| 50 MISCELLANEOUS COMPONENT | |
| | |
| 5300 Communication and sundries | 49,683 |
| 5400 Hospitality | 24,403 |
| | |
| 5999 Component total | 74,086 |
|||
| 99 GRAND TOTAL | 828,954 |
|||
| Programme support costs (13%) | 107,764 |
|===========================================|==============|
| TOTAL 1990 TRUST FUND EXPENDITURE | 936,718 |
|===========================================|==============|
UNEP/OzL.Pro.3/11
Annex V
Page 36
ANNEX V
New Annex to the Montreal Protocol
Annex D*
A LIST OF PRODUCTS** CONTAINING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES SPECIFIED IN ANNEX
A
(adopted in accordance with Article 4, paragraph 3)
PRODUCTS CUSTOMS CODE NUMBER
1. Automobile and truck air conditioning
- units (whether incorporated in vehicles
- or not) .....................
2. Domestic and commercial refrigeration
and air conditioning/heat pump equipment*** .....................
e.g. Refrigerators .....................
Freezers .....................
Dehumidifiers .....................
Water coolers .....................
Ice machines .....................
Air conditioning and heat
pump units .....................
3. Aerosol products, except medical aerosols .....................
4. Portable fire extinguisher .....................
5. Insulation boards, panels and pipe covers .....................
6. Pre-polymers .....................
- This Annex was adopted by the Third Meeting of the Parties in
Nairobi_______ June 1991 as required by paragraph 3 of Article 4 of the
Protocol.
** Though not when transported in consignments of personal or household
effects or in similar non-commercial situations normally exempted from customs
attention.
*** When containing controlled substances in Annex A as a refrigerant and/or
in insulating material of the product.
Annex VI
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR MEETINGS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE INTERIM
MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL
APPLICABILITY
Unless otherwise provided for by the Montreal Protocol or by the decision of
the Parties, or excluded by the Rules of Procedure hereunder, the Rules of
Procedures for meetings of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances
that Deplete the Ozone Layer shall apply mutatis mutandis to the
proceedings of any meeting of the Executive Committee.
Rule 1
These Rules of procedure shall apply to any meeting of the Executive
Committee for the Interim Multilateral Fund under the Protocol on Substances
that Deplete the Ozone Layer convened in accordance with Article 11 of the
Protocol.
DEFINITIONS
Rule 2
For the purposes of these rules:
1. "Executive Committee" means the Executive Committee for the Interim
Multilateral Fund as established by decision II/8 at the Second Meeting of the
Parties to the Montreal Protocol.
2. "Committee members" means Parties selected as members of the Executive
Committee for the Interim Multilateral Fund.
3. "Meeting" means any meeting of the Executive Committee for the Interim
Multilateral Fund.
4. "Chairman" means the Committee member selected Chairman of the
Executive Committee.
5. "Secretariat" means the Multilateral Fund Secretariat.
6. "Fund" means the Interim Multilateral Fund.
PLACE OF MEETINGS
Rule 3
The meetings of the Executive Committee shall take place at the seat of the
Fund Secretariat, unless other appropriate arrangements are made by the Fund
Secretariat in consultation with the Executive Committee.
DATES OF MEETINGS
Rule 4
1. Meetings of the Executive Committee shall be held at least twice every
year.
2. At each meeting, the Executive Committee shall fix the opening date and
duration of the next meeting.
Rule 5
The Secretariat shall notify all Committee members of the dates and venue of
meetings at least six weeks before the meeting.
OBSERVERS
Rule 6
1. The Secretariat shall notify the President of the Bureau and the
implementing agencies inter alia UNEP, UNDP and the World Bank of any
meeting of the Executive Committee so that they may participate as observers.
2. Such observers may, upon invitation of the Chairman, participate
without the right to vote in the proceedings of any meeting.
Rule 7
1. The Secretariat shall notify any body or agency, whether national or
international, governmental or nongovernmental, qualified in the field related
to the work of the Executive Committee, that has informed the Secretariat of
its wishes to be represented, of any meeting so that it may be represented by
an observer subject to the condition that their admission to the meeting is
not objected to by at least one third of the Parties present at the meeting.
However, the Executive Committee may determine that any portion of its
meetings involving sensitive matters may be closed to observers.
Nongovernmental observers should include observers from developing and
developed countries and their total number should be limited as far as
possible.
2. Such observers may, upon invitation of the Chairman and if there is no
objection from the Committee members present, participate without the right to
vote in the proceedings of any meeting in matters of direct concern to the
body or agency which they represent.
AGENDA
Rule 8
In agreement with the Chairman and the ViceChairman, the Secretariat shall
prepare the provisional agenda for each meeting.
Rule 9
The Secretariat shall report to the meeting on the administrative and
financial implications of all substantive agenda items submitted to the meeting,
before they are considered by it. Unless the meeting decides otherwise, no such
item shall be considered until at least twentyfour hours after the meeting has
received the Secretariat's report on the administrative and financial
implications.
Rule 10
Any item of the agenda of any meeting, consideration of which has not been
completed at the meeting, shall be included automatically in the agenda of the
next meeting, unless otherwise decided by the Executive Committee.
REPRESENTATION AND CREDENTIALS
Rule 11
The Executive Committee shall consist of seven Parties from the group of
Parties operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol and seven
Parties from the group of Parties not so operating. Each group shall select its
Executive Committee members. The members of the Executive Committee shall be
formally endorsed by the Meeting of the Parties.
Rule 12
Each Committee member shall be represented by an accredited representative
who may be accompanied by such alternate representatives and advisers as may be
required.
OFFICERS
Rule 13
If the Chairman is temporarily unable to fulfill the obligation of the
office, the ViceChairman shall in the interim assume all the obligations and
authorities of the Chairman.
Rule 14
If the Chairman or ViceChairman is unable to complete the term of office the
Committee members representing the group which selected that officer shall
select a replacement to complete the term of office.
Rule 15
1. The Secretariat shall:
(a) Make the necessary arrangements for the meetings of the Executive
Committee, including the issue of invitations and preparation of documents and
reports of the meeting;
(b) Arrange for the custody and preservation of the documents of the
meeting in the archives of the international organization designated as
secretariat of the Convention; and
(c) Generally perform all other functions that the Executive Committee may
require.
Rule 16
The Chief Officer of the Secretariat shall be the Secretary of any meeting of
the Executive Committee.
VOTING
Rule 17
Decisions of the Executive Committee shall be taken by consensus whenever
possible. If all efforts at consensus have been exhausted and no agreement
reached, decisions shall be taken by a twothirds majority of the Parties present
and voting, representing a majority of the Parties operating under paragraph 1
of Article 5 and a majority of the Parties not so operating present and voting.
LANGUAGES
Rule 18
The meeting of the Executive Committee shall be conducted in those official
languages of the United Nations required by members of the Executive Committee.
Nevertheless the Executive Committee may agree to conduct its business in one of
the United Nations official languages.
AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF PROCEDURE
Rule 19
These rules of procedure may be amended according to Rule 17 above and
formally endorsed by the Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol.
OVERRIDING AUTHORITY OF THE PROTOCOL
Rule 20
In the event of any conflict between any provision of these rules and any
provision of the Protocol, the Protocol shall prevail.
Annex VII
REVISED BUDGET FOR THE FUND SECRETARIAT FOR 1991 (United States
dollars)
Work Multilateral Counterpart Total
months Fund contribution budget
10 PERSONNEL COMPONENT
1100 Personnel (Title & Grade)
1101 Chief, Fund Secretariat (D2) 10.5 101 000 101 000
1102 Deputy Chief (P5) 6 60 000 60 000
1103 Deputy Chief (P5) 1 12 000 10 000
1104 Programme Officer (P3) 1 10 000 10 000
1105 Programme Officer (P3) 6 40 000 40 000
1106 Programme Officer (P3) 1 10 000 10 000
1107 Programme Officer (P3) 1 10 000 10 000
1108 Information Officer (P3) 1 10 000 10 000
1109 Administrative Officer (P4) 6 48 000 48 000
1199 Total 301 000 301 000
1200 Consultants
1201 Consultancies and other related studies 200 000 200 000
1299 Total 200 000 200 000
1300 Administrative support (Title & Grade)
1301 Administrative Assistant (G9) 6 19 000 19 000
1302 Library Assistant (G9) 1 3 000 3 000
1303 Senior Secretary (Chief Officer) (G7) 9 24 000 24 000
1304 Senior Secretary (Deputy) (G7) 6 16 000 16 000
1305 Secretary (Deputy) (G6) 1 2 400 2 400
1306 Secretary (for 3 P3s) (G6) 6 16 000 16 000
1307 Secretary (for P3/P4) (G6) 1 2 400 2 400
1308 Secretary (for P3/Consultants) (G6) 3 7 200 7 200
1309 Clerk/Messenger/Receptionist (G4) 6 12 000 12 000
Multilateral Counterpart Total
Fund contribution budget
1321 Conference servicing costs (CSC): 50 000 50 000
Third Meeting of Executive Committee
1322 CSC: Fourth Meeting of Executive Committee 35 000 35,000
1323 CSC: Fifth Meeting of Executive Committee 50 000 50 000
1324 CSC: Two meetings of subcommittees 10 000 10 000
1399 Total 247 000 247 000
1600 Travel on official business
1601 Travel & subsistence (Secretariat staff) 62 500 62 500
1699 Total 62 500 62 500
1999 Component total, Personnel 810 500 810 500
30 MEETINGS COMPONENT
3300 Meetings, conferences etc.
3301 Participants travel and subsistence (PTS): Third Meeting 73 500 73 500
of Executive Committee (7x3x$ 3,500)
3302 PTS: Fourth Meeting of Executive Committee (7x3x$ 3,500) 73 500 73 500
3303 PTS: Fifth Meeting of Executive Committee (7x3x$ 4,350) 91 875 91 875
3304 PTS: two meetings of subcommittees (3x2x$ 3,500) 21 000 21 000
3305 Travel and subsistence of Chairman and ViceChairman 31 250 31 250
3399 Total 291 125 291 125
3999 Component total, Meetings 291 125 291 125
Multilateral Counterpart Total
Fund contribution budget
40 EQUIPMENT AND PREMISES COMPONENT
4100 Expendable equipment (items under $500)
4101 Office stationery supplies 10 000 10 000
4199 Total 10 000 10 000
4200 Nonexpendable equipment
4201 Furniture 41 300 278 510 319 810
4202 Typewriters (2) 1 000 1 000
4203 Others 10 000 10 000
4299 Total 52 300 278 510 330 810
4300 Premises
4301 Rent of offices 61 338 174 047 235 385
4399 Total 61 338 174 047 235 385
4999 Component total, Equipment and Premises 123 638 452 557
576 195
50 MISCELLANEOUS COMPONENT
5100 Operation and maintenance of equipment
5101 Maintenance of equipment 2 000 2 000
5102 Maintenance of offices 5 000 5 000
5103 Rental of computer equipment 18 000 18 000
5104 Rental of photocopier(s) 6 000 6 000
5105 Rental of telecommunication equipment 21 000 21 000
5199 Total 52 000 52 000
Multilateral Counterpart Total
Fund contribution budget
5200 Reporting costs
5201 Reporting (document production costs) 30 000 30 000
5299 Total 30 000 30 000
5300 Sundry
5301 Communications 35 000 35 000
5302 Freight charges (shipment of documents) 10 000 10 000
5303 Others 5 000 5 000
5399 Total 50 000 50 000
5400 Hospitality
5401 Official hospitality 10 000 10 000
5499 Total 10 000 10 000
5999 Component total, Miscellaneous 142 000 142 000
99 Total excluding administrative support 1 367 263 452 557 1 819 820
Administrative support charges 52 390 52 390
GRAND TOTAL 1 419 653 452 557 1 872 210
Annex VIII
THREE YEAR PLAN AND BUDGET FOR THE FUND SECRETARIAT 1991 - 1993 (United
States Dollars)
1991 1992 1993
work work work Total
months $ months $ months $ Budget
10 PERSONNEL COMPONENT
1100 Personnel (Title & Grade)
1101 Chief, Fund Secretariat (D2) 10.5 101 000 12 111 000 12 116 000 328 000
1102 Deputy Chief (P5) 6 60 000 12 80 000 12 84 000 224 000
1103 Deputy Chief (P5) 1 12 000 12 80 000 12 84 000 176 000
1104 Programme Officer (P3) 1 10 000 12 59 000 12 62 000 131 000
1105 Programme Officer (P3) 6 40 000 12 59 000 12 62 000 161 000
1106 Programme Officer (P3) 1 10 000 12 59 000 12 62 000 131 000
1107 Programme Officer (P3) 1 10 000 12 59 000 12 62 000 131 000
1108 Information Officer (P3) 1 10 000 12 59 000 12 62 000 131 000
1109 Administrative Officer (P4) 6 48 000 12 70 000 12 74 000 192 000
1199 Total 301 000 36 000 668 000 1 605 000
1200 Consultants
1201 Consultancies and other related studies 200 000 200 000
1202 Evaluation of country specific studies/work
programmes/reports by implementing agencies 200 000 200 000 400 000
1299 Total 200 000 200 000 200 000600 000
1300 Administrative support (Title & Grade)
1301 Administrative Assistant (G9) 6 19 000 12 39 000 12 42 000 100 000
1302 Library Assistant (G9) 1 3 000 12 39 000 12 42 000 84 000
1303 Senior Secretary (Chief Officer) (G7) 9 24 000 12 35 000 12 37 000 96
000
1304 Senior Secretary (Deputy) (G7) 6 16 000 12 35 000 12 37 000 88 000
1305 Secretary (Deputy) (G6) 1 2 400 12 31 000 12 31 000 64 400
1306 Secretary (for 3 P3s) (G6) 6 16 000 12 35 000 12 35 000 86 000
1307 Secretary (for P3/P4) (G6) 1 2 400 12 31 000 12 31 000 64 400
1308 Secretary (for P3/Consultants) (G6) 3 7 200 12 31 000 12 31 000 69 200
1309 Clerk/Messenger/Receptionist (G4) 6 12 000 12 26 000 12 28 000 66 000
1991 1992 1993
work work work Total
months $ months $ months $ Budget
1321 Conference servicing costs (CSC) 50 000 50 000
Third Meeting of Executive
Committee
1322 CSC: Fourth Meeting of Executive
Committee 35 000 35 000
1323 CSC: Fifth Meeting of Executive
Committee 50 000 50 000
1324 CSC: Two meetings of subcommittees 10 000 10 000
1325 CSC: Sixth Meeting of Executive Committee 75 000 75 000
1326 CSC: Seventh Meeting of Executive Committee 75 000 75 000
1327 CSC: Eighth Meeting of Executive Committee 75 000 75 000
1328 CSC: Two meetings of subcommittees 20 000 20 000
1329 CSC: Nineth Meeting of Executive Committee 100 000 100 000
1330 CSC: Tenth Meeting of Executive Committee 100 000 100 000
1331 CSC: Eleventh Meeting of Executive Committee 100 000 100 000
1332 CSC: Two meetings of subcommittees 30 000 30 000
1399 Total 247 000 547 000 644 000 1 438 000
1600 Travel on official business
1601 Travel & subsistence (Secretariat staff) 62 500 100 000 120 000 282
500
1699 Total 62 500 100 000 120 000 282 500
1999 Component Total, Personnel 810 500 1 483 000 1 632 000 3 925 500
30 MEETINGS COMPONENT
3300 Meetings, conferences etc.
3301 Participants travel and subsistence (PTS):
- Third Meeting of Executive
Committee (7x3x$ 3,500) 73 500 73 500
3302 PTS: Fourth Meeting of Executive 73 500 73 500
Committee (7x3x$ 3,500)
3303 PTS: Fifth Meeting of Executive 91 875 91 875
Committee (7x3x$ 4,375)
1991 1992 1993
work work work Total
months $ months $ months $ Budget
3304 PTS: two meetings of 21 000 21 000
subcommittees (3x2x$ 3,500)
3305 Travel & subsistence of Chairman
and ViceChairman 31 250 37 500 43 750 112 500
3306 PTS: Sixth Meeting of Executive
Committee (7x3x$ 5,250) 110 250 110 250
3307 PTS: Seventh Meeting of Executive
Committee (7x3x$ 5,250) 110 250 110 250
3308 PTS: Eighth Meeting of Executive
Committee (7x3x$ 5,250) 110 250 110 250
3309 PTS: two meetings of
subcommittees (3x2x$ 5,250) 31 500 31 500
3310 PTS: Nineth Meeting of Executive
Committee (7x3x$ 6,125) 128 625 128 625
3311 PTS: Tenth Meeting of Executive
Committee (7x3x$ 6,125) 128 625 128 625
3312 PTS: Eleventh Meeting of Executive
Committee (7x3x$ 6,125) 128 625 128 625
3313 PTS: two meetings of
subcommittees (3x2x$ 6,125) 36 750 36 750
3399 Total 291 125 399 750 466 375 1 157 250
3999 Component Total, Meetings 291 125 399 750 466 375 1 157 250
40 EQUIPMENT AND PREMISES COMPONENT
4100 Expendable equipment (items under $500)
4101 Office stationery supplies 10 000 15 000 15 000 40 000
4102 Software and other computer expendables 15 000 10 000 25 000
4199 Total 10 000 30 000 25 000 65 000
1991 1992 1993
work work work Total
months $ months $ months $ Budget
4200 Nonexpendable equipment
4201 Furniture 319 810 319 810
4202 Typewriters (2/0/0) 1 000 1 000
4203 Personal computers (0/3/1) 22 500 7 500 30 000
4204 Portable computers (0/3/1) 15 000 5 000 20 000
4205 Others 10 000 10 000 10 000 35 000
4299 Total 330 810 47 500 22 500 400 810
4300 Premises
4301 Rent of offices 235 385 469 200 469 200 1 173 785
4399 Total 235 385 469 200 469 200 1 173 785
4999 Component total, Equipment and Premises 576 195 546 700 516 700 1 639
595
50 MISCELLANEOUS COMPONENT
5100 Operation and maintenance of equipment
5101 Maintenance of equipment 2 000 5 000 10 000 17 000
5102 Maintenance of offices 5 000 5 000 7 000 17 000
5103 Rental of computer equipment 18 000 18 000 18 000 54 000
5104 Rental of photocopier(s) 6 000 15 000 15 000 36 000
5105 Rental of telecommunication equipment 21 000 18 000 18 000 57 000
5199 Total 52 000 61 000 68 000 181 000
5200 Reporting costs
5201 Reporting (document production costs) 30 000 50 000 75 000 155 000
5299 Total 30 000 50 000 75 000 155 000
1991 1992 1993
work work work Total
months $ months $ months $ Budget
5300 Sundry
5301 Communications 35 000 50 000 75 000 160 000
5302 Freight charges (shipment of documents) 10 000 20 000 30 000 60 000
5303 Others 5 000 5 000 5 000 15 000
5399 Total 50 000 75 000 110 000 235 000
5400 Hospitality
5401 Official hospitality 10 000 15 000 20 000 45 000
5499 Total 10 000 15 000 20 000 45 000
5999 Component total, Miscellaneous 142 000 201 000 273 000 616 000
99 TOTAL excluding administrative support 1 367 263 2 161 250 2 418 875 5 947
388
Administrative support charges 52 390 121 940 127 660 301 990
Counterpart contribution 452 557 469 200 469 200 1 390 957
GRAND TOTAL 1 872 210 2 752 390 3 015 735 7 640 335
ANNEX IX
THREE YEAR BUDGET FOR THE FUND OPERATIONS 1991 - 1993
Budget Fund Operation:
1991 1992 1993
(US$ million) (US$ million) (US$ million)
Fund Income 53.33 73.33 73.33
Planned Expenditures 53.33 73.33 73.33
Allocated (as of 18 June 1991):
Implementing Agencies
IBRD 5 000 000
UNDP 1 261 800
UNEP 1 676 920
Total 7 938 720
Annex X
MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE FINANCIAL MECHANISM: SCALE OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY THE
PARTIES BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS SCALE OF ASSESSMENT WITH NO COUNTRY PAYING
MORE THAN 25 PER CENT FOR 1991, 1992, AND 1993
Developing countries that are operating under paragraph 1, article 5
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| | UN SCALE OF | %AGE BASED ON | 1991 PLEDGES | 1992 PLEDGES | 1993 PLEDGES
| |
| COUNTRY | CONTRIBUTION | UN SCALE WITH | IN | IN | IN | TOTAL |
| | %AGE | 25% CEILING | US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS | |
|__________________________|______________|_______________|______________|______________|______________|______________|
| | | 0 | | | | |
| Argentina* | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bangladesh* | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brazil | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Burkina Faso | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cameroon | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chile | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| China* | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ecuador | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Egypt | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fiji | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gambia* | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ghana | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Guatemala | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iran* | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kenya | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Libyan Arab Jamahiriya* | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malawi* | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malaysia | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maldives | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mexico | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nigeria | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Panama** | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sri Lanka | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thailand | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Togo* | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tunisia | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Uganda | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Uruguay* | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Venezuela | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yugoslavia* | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zambia | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | | | | | | |
| TOTAL | 6.77% | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|__________________________|______________|_______________|______________|______________|______________|______________|
Developing countries that are not operating under paragraph 1, article
5
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| | | | | | | |
| Bahrain | 0.02% | 0.02% | 12,553 | 16,904 | 16,904 | 46,361 |
| Malta | 0.01% | 0.01% | 6,276 | 8,452 | 8,452 | 23,180 |
| Singapore | 0.11% | 0.13% | 69,041 | 92,973 | 92,973 | 254,987 |
| United Arab Emirates | 0.19% | 0.22% | 119,253 | 160,590 | 160,590 |
440,433 |
|__________________________|______________|_______________|______________|______________|______________|______________|
Developed countries
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| | UN SCALE OF | %AGE BASED ON | 1991 PLEDGES | 1992 PLEDGES | 1993 PLEDGES
| |
| COUNTRY | CONTRIBUTION | UN SCALE WITH | IN | IN | IN | TOTAL |
| | %AGE | 25% CEILING | US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS | US DOLLARS | |
|__________________________|______________|_______________|______________|______________|______________|______________|
| | | | | | | |
| Australia | 1.57% | 1.81% | 985,407 | 1,326,980 | 1,326,980 | 3,639,367 |
| Austria | 0.74% | 0.85% | 464,459 | 625,456 | 625,456 | 1,715,370 |
| Bulgaria* | 0.15% | 0.17% | 0 | 126,782 | 126,782 | 253,563 |
| Byelorussian S.S.R. | 0.33% | 0.38% | 207,124 | 278,919 | 278,919 | 764,963
|
| Canada | 3.09% | 3.56% | 1,939,432 | 2,611,699 | 2,611,699 | 7,162,831 |
| Czechoslovakia* | 0.66% | 0.76% | 0 | 557,839 | 557,839 | 1,115,677 |
| Finland | 0.51% | 0.59% | 320,100 | 431,057 | 431,057 | 1,182,214 |
| Hungary | 0.21% | 0.24% | 131,806 | 177,494 | 177,494 | 486,794 |
| Iceland | 0.03% | 0.03% | 18,829 | 25,356 | 25,356 | 69,542 |
| Japan | 11.38% | 13.11% | 7,142,633 | 9,618,492 | 9,618,492 | 26,379,617 |
| Liechtenstein | 0.01% | 0.01% | 6,276 | 8,452 | 8,452 | 23,180 |
| New Zealand | 0.24% | 0.28% | 150,635 | 202,850 | 202,850 | 556,336 |
| Norway | 0.55% | 0.63% | 345,206 | 464,866 | 464,866 | 1,274,937 |
| Poland* | 0.56% | 0.65% | 0 | 473,318 | 473,318 | 946,635 |
| South Africa | 0.45% | 0.52% | 282,442 | 380,345 | 380,345 | 1,043,131 |
| Sweden | 1.21% | 1.39% | 759,454 | 1,022,704 | 1,022,704 | 2,804,863 |
| Switzerland | 1.08% | 1.24% | 677,860 | 912,827 | 912,827 | 2,503,514 |
| Ukrainian S.S.R. | 1.25% | 1.44% | 784,560 | 1,056,513 | 1,056,513 |
2,897,585 |
| U.S.S.R. | 9.99% | 11.51% | 6,270,202 | 8,443,650 | 8,443,650 | 23,157,501
|
| United States | 25.00% | 25.00% | 13,333,333 | 18,333,333 | 18,333,333 |
50,000,000 |
| | | | | | | |
| E.E.C. members | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Belgium | 1.17% | 1.35% | 734,348 | 988,896 | 988,896 | 2,712,140 |
| Denmark | 0.69% | 0.80% | 433,077 | 583,195 | 583,195 | 1,599,467 |
| France | 6.25% | 7.20% | 3,922,799 | 5,282,564 | 5,282,564 | 14,487,926 |
| Germany | 9.36% | 10.79% | 5,874,784 | 7,911,167 | 7,911,167 | 21,697,118 |
| Greece | 0.40% | 0.46% | 251,059 | 338,084 | 338,084 | 927,227 |
| Ireland | 0.18% | 0.21% | 112,977 | 152,138 | 152,138 | 417,253 |
| Italy | 3.99% | 4.60% | 2,504,315 | 3,372,389 | 3,372,389 | 9,249,092 |
| Luxembourg | 0.06% | 0.07% | 37,659 | 50,713 | 50,713 | 139,084 |
| Netherlands | 1.65% | 1.90% | 1,035,619 | 1,394,597 | 1,394,597 | 3,824,813
|
| Portugal | 0.18% | 0.21% | 112,977 | 152,138 | 152,138 | 417,253 |
| Spain | 1.95% | 2.25% | 1,223,913 | 1,648,160 | 1,648,160 | 4,520,233 |
| United Kingdom | 4.86% | 5.60% | 3,050,369 | 4,107,721 | 4,107,721 |
11,265,812 |
| | | | | | | |
| EEC MEMBERS TOTAL | 30.74% | 35.43% | 19,293,896 | 25,981,761 | 25,981,761
| 71,257,417 |
| | | | | | | |
|==========================|==============|===============|==============|==============|==============|==============|
| TOTAL | 96.85% | 100.00% | 53,320,777 | 73,339,611 | 73,339,611 |
200,000,000 |
|==========================|==============|===============|==============|==============|==============|==============|
NB: (*) Parties who have acceded to the Montreal Protocol in between the
Second meeting of the
Parties and the Third Meeting of the Parties.
(**) Panama has been reclassified as a developing country operating under
paragraph 1 of
Article 5 as opposed to not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5.
Annex XI
FORMATS FOR REPORTING DATA UNDER THE AMENDED MONTREAL PROTOCOL
INTRODUCTION SHEET
1. The data formats are for the use of the Parties in reporting data on
the production, import and export of each individual substances listed in the
annexes of the Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, as required by Article 7.
2. There are 6 forms for reporting the required data:
(a) Data for the base years for controlling production and consumption
- For reporting 1986 data, as required by Article 7, paragraph 1:
Form 1: Annex A substances
For reporting 1989 data, as required by Article 7, paragraph 2:
Form 1: Annex B substances
Form 2: Annex C substances
(b) Annual reporting of data for the year the Protocol enters into force
for the country in question and for each year thereafter, in accordance with
paragraph 3
Form 4: Annex A substances
Form 5: Annex B substances
Form 6: Annex C substances
3. Please report the data in metric tons, without multiplying by the
relevant ODPS (Ozone Depleting Potentials). The data on each substance should
also include isomers [Note 1.1.1. trichloroethane (methyl chloroform) does not
include 1.1.2. trichloroethane].
4. The data reported in accordance with the formats will be used to
determine the calculated levels of consumption upon which the control measures
are based. It is thus crucial that data be provided separately for each
individual substance listed in the formats.
5. Please note that both paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 7 provide that the
Parties should submit the best possible estimates where actual data are not
available.
6. In accordance with the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Group of
Experts on the Reporting Data, which held its first meeting at Nairobi on 6
and 7 December 19910, the Parties are requested to report on the extra
production as allowed to meet the basic domestic needs of countries operating
under paragraph 1 of Article 5 of the Protocol. The quantity of the production
increase and the country to be supplied by this production increase should be
reported under "quantity" and "destination".
- The export figures as well as the production figures reported should
include the increased amounts of production for supplying the countries
operating under Article 5, paragraph 1. The allowable increase in production
should also be reported as metric tonnes.
7. In accordance with the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Group of
Experts on the Reporting of Data, which held its first meeting at Nairobi on 6
and 7 December, 1990, countries having freetrade zones inside their
territories should make a special effort to include in their data reporting
production, import and export figures for such zones.
8. In accordance with the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Group of
Experts on the Reporting of Data, which held its first meeting at Nairobi on 6
and 7 December 1990, the quantities of controlled substances used for
refilling the refrigeration and fireextinguishing systems of ships in ports
should be regarded as forming part of consumption of the country with
jurisdiction over the part and should therefore, not, be included in its
exports figures.
9. With regard to the data on "amounts destroyed", the Parties, decided at
their Second Meeting, to establish an Ad Hoc technical advisory
committee on destruction technologies to analyse destruction technologies and
to assess their efficiency and environmental acceptability, so as to develop
approval criteria and measurements. Separate data on the amounts destroyed
need not be reported until such approval criteria are established.
10. Amounts used as feedstocks, e.g. amounts of carbon tetrachloride used
as feedstock in the production of CFC 11 and 12, should be reported. They are
to be subtracted from total production (see definition production).
11. No separate column has been included to record on the amounts recycled
or reused. However, these amounts are not to be regarded as production (see
definition of production).
DEFINITIONS
1. "Production" means the amount of controlled substances produced, minus
the amount destroyed by technologies to be approved by the Parties and minus
the amount entirely used as feedstock in the manufacture of other chemicals.
The amount recycled and reused is not to be considered as "production"
(Article 1, paragraph 5 of the Amendment).
2. "Consumption" means production plus imports minus exports of controlled
substances (Article 1, paragraph 6, of the Protocol and the Amendment).
3. "calculated levels" of production, imports, exports and consumption
mean levels determined in accordance with article 3 (Article 1, paragraph 7,
of the Protocol and the Amendment).
4. "Transitional substance" means a substance in annex C to the Protocol,
whether existing alone or in a mixture. It includes the isomers of any such
substance, as may be specified in annex c, but excludes any transitional
substance or mixture which is in a manufactured product other than a container
used for the transportation or storage of that substance.
5. Methyl chloroform is 1,1,1trichloroethane and does not include
1,1,2trichloroethane.
ANNEX XII
Reporting of data under Article 7, paragraph 1
1986 DATA ON PRODUCTION, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF CFCs AND HALONS CONTROLLED
BY THE AMENDED MONTREAL PROTOCOL
(Metric Tonnes)
Country
Annex A Substances
Ref: Data form 2
SUBSTANCES PRODUCTION IMPORTS EXPORTS
GROUP I
CFCl3 CFC11
CF2Cl2 CFC12
C2F3Cl3 CFC113
C2F4Cl2 CFC114
C2F5Cl CFC115
TOTAL FOR GROUP I
GROUP II
CF2BrCl HALON 1211
CF3Br HALON 1301
C2F4Br2 HALON 2402
TOTAL FOR GROUP II
Notes:
1. Please report the data by weight and not multiplied by ODP.
2. Isomers should be included under each substance.
Ref: Data form 2
Reporting of data under Article 7, paragraph 2
1989 DATA ON PRODUCTION, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF SUBSTANCES
CONTROLLED BY THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL
(Metric Tonnes)
Country
Annex B Substances
SUBSTANCES PRODUCTION IMPORTS EXPORTS
GROUP I
CF3Cl (CFC13)
C2FCl5 (CFC111)
C2F2Cl4 (CFC112)
C3FCl7 (CFC211)
C3F2Cl6 (CFC212)
C3F3Cl5 (CFC213)
C3F4Cl4 (CFC214)
C3F5Cl3 (CFC215)
C3F6Cl2 (CFC216)
C3F7Cl (CFC217)
TOTAL FOR GROUP I
GROUP II
CCl4
(carbon tetrachloride)
GROUP III
C2H3Cl3**
(methyl chloroform, i.e.
1,1,1trichloroethane)
Notes:
- This formula does not refer to 1,1,2trichloroethane.
1. Please report the data by weight and not multiplied by ODP.
2. Isomers should be included under each substance.
- Ref: Data form 3
Reporting of data under Article 7, paragraph 2
1989 DATA ON PRODUCTION, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF TRANSITIONAL SUBSTANCES
LISTED IN THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL
(Metric Tonnes)
Country:
Annex C Substances
SUBSTANCES PRODUCTION IMPORTS EXPORTS
CFHCl2 (HCFC21)
CHF2Cl (HCFC22)
CH2FCl (HCFC31)
C2HFCl4 (HCFC121)
C2HF2Cl3 (HCFC122)
C2HF3Cl2 (HCFC123)
C2HF4Cl (HCFC124)
C2H2FCl3 (HCFC131)
C2H2F2Cl2 (HCFC132)
C2H2F3Cl (HCFC133)
C2H3FCl2 (HCFC141)
C2H3F2Cl (HCFC142)
C2H4FCl (HCFC151)
C3HFCl6 (HCFC221)
C3HF2Cl5 (HCFC222)
C3HF3Cl4 (HCFC223)
C3HF4Cl3 (HCFC224)
C3HF5Cl2 (HCFC225)
C3HF6Cl (HCFC226)
C3H2FCl5 (HCFC231)
SUBSTANCES PRODUCTION IMPORTS EXPORTS
C3H2F2Cl4 (HCFC232)
C3H2F3Cl3 (HCFC233)
C3H2F4Cl2 (HCFC234)
C3H2F5Cl (HCFC235)
C3H3FCl4 (HCFC241)
C3H3F2Cl3 (HCFC242)
C3H3F3Cl2 (HCFC243)
C3H3F4Cl (HCFC244)
C3H4FCl3 (HCFC251)
C3H4F2Cl2 (HCFC252)
C3H4F3Cl (HCFC253)
C3H5FCl2 (HCFC261)
C3H5F2Cl (HCFC262)
C3H6FCl (HCFC271)
Notes:
1. Please report the data by weight and not multiplied by ODP.
2. Isomers should be included under each substance.
Ref: Data form 4
Reporting of data under Article 7, paragraph 3
DATA ON PRODUCTION, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF SUBSTANCES CONTROLLED BY THE
AMENDED MONTREAL PROTOCOL
(Metric Tonnes)
Country:
Year: January December 199
July 199 June 199
(delete as appropriate)
Annex A Substances
IMPORTS EXPORTS ANNEX A TOTAL AMOUNTS AMOUNTS FROM FROM TO TO SUBSTANCES
PRODUCTION DESTROYED FOR FEED PARTIES NON PARTIES NONPARTIES
STOCKS PARTIES
GROUP 1
CFCl3 (CFC11)
CF2Cl2 (CFC12)
C2F3Cl3 (CFC113)
C2F4Cl2 (CFC114)
C2F5Cl (CFC115)
TOTAL FOR GROUP 1
GROUP II
CF2BrCl (HALON 1211)
CF3Br (HALON 1301)
C2F4Br2 (HALON 2402)
TOTAL FOR GROUP II
Notes:
1. Please report the data by weight and not multiplied by ODP.
2. Isomers should be included under each substance.
Ref: Data form 5
Reporting of data under Article 7, paragraph 3
DATA ON PRODUCTION, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF SUBSTANCES CONTROLLED BY THE
AMENDED MONTREAL PROTOCOL
(Metric Tonnes)
Country:
Year: January December 199
July 199 June 199
(delete as appropriate)
Annex B Substances
IMPORTS EXPORTS
ANNEX B TOTAL AMOUNTS AMOUNTS INCREASED PRODUCTION FROM FROM TO TO SUBSTANCES
PRODUCTION DESTROYED FOR FEED AS FURTHER ALLOWED* PARTIES NON PARTIES NONPARTIES
STOCKS Quan.** Dest.** PARTIES
GROUP I
CF3Cl (CFC13)
C2FCl5 (CFC111)
C2F2Cl4 (CFC112)
C3FCl7 (CFC211)
C3F2Cl6 (CFC212)
C3F3Cl5 (CFC213)
C3F4Cl4 (CFC214)
C3F5Cl3 (CFC215)
C3F6Cl2 (CFC216)
C3F7Cl (CFC217)
TOTAL FOR GROUP I
Notes
- For satisfying the basic domestic needs of countries operating under
Article 5.1 of the Protocol ** Abbreviation for quantity and destination.
1. Please report the data by weight and not multiplied by ODP.
2. Isomers should be included under each substance.
Ref: Data form 5 continued
Reporting of data under Article 7, paragraph 3
DATA ON PRODUCTION, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF TRANSITIONAL SUBSTANCES LISTED IN
THE AMENDEND MONTREAL PROTOCOL
(Metric Tonnes)
Country:
Year: January December 199
July 199 June 199
(delete as appropriate)
Annex B Substances
IMPORTS EXPORTS
ANNEX A TOTAL AMOUNTS AMOUNTS INCREASED PRODUCTION FROM FROM TO TO SUBSTANCES
PRODUCTION DESTROYED FOR FEED AS FURTHER ALLOWED* PARTIES NON PARTIES NONPARTIES
STOCKS Quan.** Dest.** PARTIES
GROUP I
CCl4
(carbon tetrachloride)
GROUP III
C2H3Cl3**
(methyl chloroform, i.e.
l,l,l trichloroethane)
Notes:
- For satisfying the basic domestic needs of countries operating under
Article 5 pagragraph 1 of the Protocol.
** Abbreviation for quantity and destination.
*** This formula does not refer to 1,1,2-trichloroethane.
1. Please report the data by weight and not multiplied by ODP.
2. Isomers should be included under each substance.
Ref: Data form 6
Reporting of data under Article 7, paragraph 3
DATA ON PRODUCTION, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS OF TRANSITIONAL SUBSTANCES LISTED IN
THE AMENDED MONTREAL PROTOCOL
(Metric Tonnes)
Country:
Year: January December 199
July 199 June 199
(delete as appropriate)
Annex C Substances
IMPORTS EXPORTS
ANNEX C TOTAL AMOUNTS AMOUNTS FROM FROM TO TO TRANSITIONAL SUBSTANCES
PRODUCTION DESTROYED FOR FEED PARTIES NON PARTIES NONPARTIES
STOCKS PARTIES
GROUP I
CFCl2 (HCFC21)
CHF2Cl (HCFC22)
CH2FCl (HCFC31)
C2HFCl4 (HCFC121)
C2HF2Cl3 (CFC122)
C2HF3Cl2 (HCFC123)
C2HF4Cl (HCFC124)
C2H2FCl3 (HCFC131)
C2H2F2Cl2 (HCFC132)
C2H2F3Cl (HCFC133)
C2H3FCl2 (HCFC141)
C2H3F2Cl (HCFC142)
C2H4FCl (HCFC151)
C3HFCl6 (HCFC221)
IMPORTS EXPORTS
ANNEX C TOTAL AMOUNTS AMOUNTS FROM FROM TO TO TRANSITIONAL SUBSTANCES
PRODUCTION DESTROYED FOR FEED PARTIES NON PARTIES NONPARTIES
STOCKS PARTIES
C3HF2Cl5 (HCFC222)
C3HF3Cl4 (HCFC223)
C3HF4Cl3 (HCFC224)
C3HF5Cl2 (HCFC225)
C3HF6Cl (HCFC226)
C3H2FCl5 (HCFC231)