Methyl Bromide Alternatives (Decision Ex.I/4(1) (2))
Party
Year of submission
Australia
2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014, 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021 , 2022
Canada
2005, 2008 , 2011, 2012, 2014, 2016 , 2017 , 2018
European Union – Soil
2005
See EC Management Strategy for Phase-out of
Critical Uses of MB, Annex 4C
European Union - Postharvest
2005
Israel
2006, 2008
Japan
2005, 2008 , 2010
New Zealand
2005
South Africa
2022
United States of America
2005 , 2007, 2008 , 2011, 2012 , 2013 , 2014
National Management Strategy for Phase-out of Critical Uses of Methyl Bromide (Decision Ex.I/4(3)
Critical use nominations for methyl bromide use (Decision Ex.I/4(7)(8))
Party
Year of Submissions
Argentina
2016 , 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021
Australia
2005 , 2008 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 , 2013, 2014, 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021 , 2022
Canada
2005 , 2008 , 2010 , 2011 , 2014, 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2021 , 2022
China
2016 , 2017
European Union
2005 , 2006 , 2007
Japan
2005 , 2008 , 2010
Mexico
2015
NewZealand
2006
South Africa
2016 , 2017 , 2018 , 2019 , 2020 , 2022
United States of America
2005 , 2006 , 2008 , 2011 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014
Application of Criteria in Decision IX/6 when Licensing, Permitting or Authorizing the use of Methyl Bromide (Decisions Ex.I/3(5), XVI/2(4), XVII/9(5) and XVIII/13(6))
Party
Year of Submission
Australia
2008 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014, 2015
Canada
2008 , 2010 , 2011 , 2014, 2015
European Union
2005 , 2006 , 2007
Japan
2006 , 2008
United States of America
2005 , 2007 , 2008 , 2012 , 2013 , 2014